{"id":457,"date":"2022-04-24T21:02:14","date_gmt":"2022-04-25T04:02:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/malat-webspace.royalroads.ca\/rru0165\/?p=457"},"modified":"2022-04-25T08:53:57","modified_gmt":"2022-04-25T15:53:57","slug":"technology-presence-mapping","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/malat-webspace.royalroads.ca\/rru0165\/technology-presence-mapping\/","title":{"rendered":"Technology Presence Mapping"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

As part of LRNT 521 I have been asked to rank my use of technology and how it represents my digital identity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

White and Le Cornu (2011) proposed a metaphor for ones engagement with online technology as either being like a visitor or like a resident. You can map out your technology use and help identify your public digital identity by listing all the technologies you use regularly and by giving them a rank on the scale from visitor (your use of the technology leaves little trace of your identity publicly) to resident (where the use of the technology shares a part of yourself for others to see). In his video, White (2013), maps out his digital presence using the visitor\/resident scale on the x-axis and whether the technology is used for personal or professional use on the y-axis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Below is my technology use mapping.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

There are a few technologies that are commonly known as social media (“Social Media,” 2022) that did not make it on the mapping above, since I currently do not<\/strong> have an active account on those platforms:<\/p>\n\n\n\n