When I first looked at Topic A, I saw three related but different entry points: poverty, the digital divide, and access to technology. At first, access to technology seemed like the most obvious concern. If learners do not have a device, internet connection, or reliable platform access, digital learning cannot meaningfully begin. However, the more I explored the topic, the more I realized that access is only one layer of the issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Overall, digital learning has already changed how I understand poverty, access to technology, and the digital divide. Poverty and access remain important, especially in broader social and educational contexts. For my briefing note though, I focused on the digital divide aspect because it allowed me to move beyond the question of whether technology is available and ask whether learners can actually participate, practice, and benefit from digital learning. This distinction became especially important when thinking about workplace learning. In many work environments, access to technology is provided by the organization, however, this does not mean every learner experiences the digital learning environment equally.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The main takeaway for me is that digital learning has made the digital divide more complex. It has expanded access in many ways, but it has also revealed that access alone does not create equal learning opportunity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27<\/em>, 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.iheduc.2015.04.007<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Castelli, F. R., & Sarvary, M. A. (2021). Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do so. Ecology and Evolution, 11<\/em>(8), 3565\u20133576. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ece3.7123<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Dron, J., & Anderson, T. (2014). Teaching crowds: Learning and social media<\/em>. Athabasca University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15215\/aupress\/9781927356807.01<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2<\/em>(2\u20133), 87\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1096-7516(00)00016-6<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Gottschalk, F., & Weise, C. (2023). Digital equity and inclusion in education: An overview of practice and policy in OECD countries<\/em> (OECD Education Working Papers No. 299). OECD Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/7cb15030-en<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 11<\/em>(2), 239\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13691180801946150<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Jisc. (n.d.). Individual digital capabilities<\/em>. https:\/\/digitalcapability.jisc.ac.uk\/what-is-digital-capability\/individual-digital-capabilities\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learning, 22<\/em>(1), 205\u2013222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24059\/olj.v22i1.1092<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Rheingold, H. (2010). Attention, and other 21st-century social media literacies. EDUCAUSE Review, 45<\/em>(5), 14\u201324. https:\/\/er.educause.edu\/articles\/2010\/10\/attention-and-other-21stcentury-social-media-literacies<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n