Yoda vs. Elon Musk: Does EdTech really teach, or just deliver?

LRNT523: Activity 5
Written by Kirsten & Kym

The media debate between Richard Clark (Yoda) and Robert Kozma (Elon Musk) is as hot as ever in today’s EdTech-saturated world. Clark famously argues that media is just a tool for delivery, like receiving from DoorDash—it doesn’t influence how we learn. Kozma fires back, claiming that the media does much more, actually transforming the learning experience.

Aligned with this debate is a recent conversation between one of ed-tech’s darlings MagicTech and Adam Spencer of AbleDocs (now GrackleDocs) on pandemic-driven tech in education. During the lockdown, accessibility tools like AI captions and digital learning platforms were hailed as breakthroughs, particularly for students with disabilities. But did these innovations actually improve learning, or just change the way it’s delivered? Clark would say that while these tools improved access, they didn’t improve the learning process itself—good instruction could happen with or without them. Kozma, on the other hand, would argue that such tools expand how students can interact with content, creating genuinely new educational experiences.

In “Technology Gives K–12 Teachers the Power to Teach from Anywhere” (EdTech Magazine, 2023) the author explores how advancements in educational technology allow teachers to adapt lessons and instruct from various locations, making the teaching process more flexible and inclusive. Cloud platforms, virtual learning environments, and collaboration tools like Google Classroom and Microsoft Teams are central to this transformation allowing real-time communication, remote lesson planning, and assessment. Kozma would argue these tools reshape traditional teaching approaches, promoting accessibility and equity in education. Clark would contend that interactive learning experiences can be achieved just as effectively without technology.

By revisiting this debate, it reminds us to always critically examine the EdTech industry’s bold claims. Clark encourages us to question Kozma’s optimism and ask whether these technologies are truly enhancing student learning. So, when researching new tech in education, the question we need to ask is: should we meet Yoda in the swamp or fly to Mars with Elon?


References

Buck, T. E. (2024, January 18). Technology Gives K–12 Teachers the Power to Teach from Anywhere. Technology Solutions That Drive Education. https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2023/11/technology-gives-k-12-teachers-power-teach-anywhere

Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004445

Ideogram.ai. (2024). Photographic image for blog post: Yoda vs. Elon Musk: Does EdTech really teach, or just deliver. https://ideogram.ai/explore

Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002179

Magic EdTech. (2024, June 12). Preparing Learners with Disabilities for the Workforce of Tomorrow [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfdhmL5qcuw

Cassandra or Chicken Little?

LRNT523: Assignment 1

Decoding Audrey Watters role in Ed Tech

Audrey Watters is a renowned writer, educator and speaker, known for her biting critiques of Ed Tech. Being considered one of the OGs wasn’t what drew me to her for this assignment. It was instead her reputation as a troublemaker and rabble rouser, dubbing herself “Ed Tech’s Cassandra” (Watters, 2023). Anyone comparing herself to a mythological prophet was someone I wanted to know more about.

Fascinated by the woman, I dug into her legendary critiques. It felt like my first rocky attempts at watching Game of Thrones: hard to get through but oddly compelling. As a card-carrying technology enthusiast, hearing Watters lambaste my beloved tech was tough. Watters had raised alarm bells, but I couldn’t help thinking, was she more Chicken Little than Cassandra?

Cassandra, cursed to utter true prophecies that no one believed, foresaw Troy’s fall but couldn’t sway her people, leading to their ruin. Chicken Little, on the other hand, freaked out over an acorn thinking the sky was falling, sparking unfounded and unnecessary panic.

Truth: I was hoping for a Chicken Little win to let my tech community off the hook.

But I’ve struggled to feather Watters. I couldn’t dismiss her as merely an alarmist. Watters backs her critiques with robust research and many of her warnings, like the exaggerated hype of MOOCs replacing traditional education, have proven prescient (McMillan Cottom, 2017; Selwyn 2021). And rather than an acorn-hazed forecaster of doom, her insights offer a thoughtful guide on how tech can integrate with education without ethical compromise.

Watters shouldn’t be portrayed as the fated Cassandra either, dismissed by overly optimistic tech evangelists. Watters is neither a prophet of tragedy nor a misguided alarmist. She has emerged as a vital voice – a grounded skeptic, ensuring Ed Tech doesn’t lose its way in the dazzle of innovation.


References

Audrey Watters. (2023). Audrey Watters. https://audreywatters.com/

McMillan Cottom, T. (2017). Lower ed: The troubling rise of for-profit colleges in the new economy. The New Press.

Selwyn, N. (2021). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.


Links

Hack Education – Audrey Watters Ed Tech blog with the best list of definitions for the word “hack”

Future Trends Forum 1: Audrey Watters (youtube.com) – Conversation with Bryan Alexander on all things Watters (while demonstrating Shindig conference software)

Teaching Machines with Audrey Watters (youtube.com) – Watters reading an excerpt from her book “Teaching Machines” for UTS Learner’s Experience Lab


Just for fun

Chicken Little (2005) Trailer – YouTube – would you tell anyone?

From Control to Curate: The Decentralized Learning Revolution

LRNT523: Activity 3

As a management consultant guiding organizations through AI adoption, one thing is clear: how people share and acquire knowledge is changing as fast as the technology they’re trying to adopt. Weller’s insights (2020) from 2002-2011 still ring true, offering lessons that are more relevant than ever. Let’s jump into two that stood out to me.

Curate, Don’t Create

Remember when everyone was obsessed with creating content? Blogging, vlogging, and yes, a bit of oversharing. But then came a revelation: why create when you can curate? Tools like RSS feeds and wikis taught us that the real power lies in gathering and curating content from existing sources. For organizations, this is a goldmine—stop writing long, outdated manuals and start curating the best resources from across the web. It’s faster, stays fresher, and it’s a whole lot less painful.

Connectivism vs. Corporate Control

Now here’s a challenge we still face: connectivism. This theory suggests that learning happens through networks—connections between people, resources, and information. Sounds great, right? Enter corporate control. Most organizations are still clinging to rigid, top-down learning models while touting learning frameworks like the 70-20-10 model (70% on-the-job, 20% social learning, 10% formal training). But in reality, it’s all formal training! Employees need space to explore, innovate, and connect freely—or else, they’re learning at a 1990s pace in a 5G world.

Takeaway: The future of learning is decentralized. Stop controlling—start curating and connecting.


References

Jasper Art. (2024). Photographic image for blog post: From Control to Curate: The Decentralized Learning Revolution. https://app.jasper.ai/art

Weller, M. (2020). 25 years of ed tech. Athabasca University Press. https://read.aupress.ca/read/25-years-of-ed-tech/section/e69021f2-91b6-4ca4-9d0b-81d3e9748707