Activity 1: Theoretical Frameworks

For my research paper there are two theoretical frameworks that interest me and that I think could help guide me in answering my research question. First, the question that I seek to answer is: In what ways might blended or hybrid continuing education courses for adults in secondary school be designed to contribute to self-efficacy and student satisfaction?

The theoretical frameworks that I would like to explore further are adult learning theory and self-efficacy theory. These theories tackle the two aspects of my question with adult learning theory describing how adult learners learn differently from child learners (Knowles, 1973) and self-efficacy theory which notes the significance of self-confidence with regards to the completion of tasks (Bandura, 1994).

Adult learning theory has been very familiar for me in my work surrounding adult learners. Knowles (1984) made five assumptions for adult learners: 1) more self-directed, 2) coming from a place of experience, 3) more willing to learn once relevance has been determined, 4) learn better by “doing”, and 5) more intrinsically motivated to learn. Starting from these points, I could start an inquiry on what can be appropriate design for adult learners in a blended learning environment.

Self-efficacy theory is a bit more newer to me, but a theory that I find important as I feel that for students to do well, their own self-perception or confidence can have a major impact on outcomes. Bandura (1994) notes that these beliefs on one’s ability can affect cognitive, motivational, affective and selection processes which will invariably alter the learning experience.

Ideally I’d like to incorporate both these theories into my research, but I’m still contemplating the proper mix or if I can just utilize certain elements as a conceptual framework. Reading through Grant and Osanloo (2014), I think I have an idea of what the difference between a theoretical framework vs. a conceptual framework is, but breaking down a real example is a bit more difficult…

Any thoughts/comments would be greatly appreciated.

 

References

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human
behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.

Grant, C., and Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, selecting, and integrating a theoretical framework in dissertation research: Creating the blueprint for you ‘house’Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, and Research. DOI: 10.5929/2014.4.2.9. 

Knowles, M. S. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston, TX: Gulf.

Knowles, M. S. (1984). Andragogy in action: Applying modern principles of adult education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Activity 2: Disseminating Research

The prospect of disseminating research is always an exciting opportunity. After a long arduous journey creating a piece of work that one can be proud of, naturally you’d want to share it with the world.

For my potential research topic in looking at self-efficacy/satisfaction in adult students based on course design in online/blended courses, I think presentations at my own school board would be a good avenue to share my findings. I hope that some educators will see merit in what I come up with and it can inform practices and delivery methods. My school board is finally undergoing a paradigm shift in looking at global competencies and digital literacy and I think my research paper can hopefully be a small piece in that plan.

Subsequently, any conferences or academic journals that would seem like a good fit for my paper are welcome as well. Having presented at a few conferences and made some paper submissions, I’m well aware of the nuances and requirements of certain organizations and journals. There will definitely be more reading in the future to see where my research could potentially find a home.