Exploring Modalities: A Reflection by Team Awesome Sauce

Team Awesome Sauce are: Bobbi Donnison,  Krista Frate, Marshall Hartlen, Steve Minten, and Nicolette Young

After much discussion and mind changing, Team Awesome Sauce has decided to explore edX, both as a massive open online course (MOOC) provider, and as an educational app for Android or IOS. We will outline the beginning of our journey by using a classic k-12 learning modality: the know, wonder, learn (KWL)) chart. A KWL chart is a way to guide inquiry. It assesses what you already know, (in this case our collective knowledge of learning modalities) what we wonder/want to know about our topic, and finally what we hope to learn in pursuing the inquiry further. For the purposes of this post, we applied this inquiry organising strategy to three guiding questions:

  1. What type of modality did we choose?
  2. What question(s) would you like to pursue as you examine or experience the modality?
  3. What background reading did you do to learn more about the modality? (Blogs, websites, library journal articles). Write a summary of what you learned.

In each instance a degree of expansion and explanation is included, which, it is hoped, will help keep all of us on track as we individually and collectively delve deeper into specific issues and aspects of our modality, and the instance of edX in particular.

What we KNOW about this modality/instance: What type of modality did you choose?

edX exists in the realm of MOOCs and is viewed by some as more exclusive than competing platforms due in part to the fact that the courses on offer are not necessarily free. It is also driven by prestigious US universities such as Harvard, and MIT lending it a certain degree of prestige and legitimacy as well. Similar to other MOOCs, edX offers the opportunity to upskill for employment, and offers a wide range of eclectic courses ranging from Civil War History, to R Programming basics. MOOCs are a relatively recent platform for learning, and edX is younger still, only coming online in 2012. Considering this relatively short time frame the range and quantity of courses they offer is impressive, as are the academic levels available: ranging from self paced tutorials on specific software applications, to micro-masters courses (the latter of which we will revisit in the wonder section). We ultimately chose this modality as it afforded further inquiry more readily across all of our diverse personal contexts, and was also supported by a mobile applications, which extends further, the opportunity for inquiry.

What We Wonder: What question(s) would we like to pursue as we examine or experience the modality?

In the shared economy, traditional means of monetising are disappearing in favour of pay per use subscription style services (e.g. Airbnb, Uber, Adobe Creative Cloud, Office 365). These services bypass the traditional economy in the same way that MOOCs bypass traditional education, but how can such an enterprise be economically sustainable? edX is backed by traditional universities, but the cost may be a minute fraction of what is available at the parent universities. If such platforms continue to gain traction, will they make the brick and mortar universities redundant? In wondering about this, we also question the legitimacy and quality of education received through such instances. Who will actually recognise an edX degree, and given the flexible pace and restricted access to university research databases, how can the quality of inquiry possibly compare to similar offerings in more traditional educational settings?

An obvious advantage to learning in this manner is accessibility. edX courses are available 24-7, restricted only by internet connectivity, but what other benefits are there to this modality? Cost is an obvious one, but again the question of quality persists, and what challenges do these observations present? From a pedagogical standpoint, we are curious to understand what constitutes best practice for course design and delivery? Current best practice traditional classroom teaching incorporates a variety of formative exercises to aid skill development and content knowledge, how does learning through a MOOC account for this and how does it engage the learner?

The opportunity to cater to individual learners seems vast, and we hypothesise that such modalities offer a decent coverage of content knowledge, but how effective are MOOCs at developing the soft skills of human interaction and collaboration, which are increasingly vital in the 21st century economy?

Finally, we wonder who this modality is targeting, and what uses are not currently being utilised, but that may be available in similar applications? If functionality is omitted, what is the rationale, and how does it make for a better learning experience. And perhaps most important of all, if qualifications become recognised as providing credit, how can edX be assured the student is the student?

What we Learned (so far): What background reading did you do to learn more about the modality? (Blogs, websites, library journal articles).

We explored the basic history of MOOCs and educational applications in general, and then browsed articles pertaining to edX in particular, including the site itself. We also investigated the app and ensured it was available on both Android and Apple devices for accessibility of the whole team.

“Today’s online learners require flexibility, and mobile devices are a solution to remove the barrier of a fixed time, place, and mode of learning. Tailoring online education to meet the needs of those who wish to learn “anywhere, anytime,” however, will be an ongoing challenge” (Hutchinson, Tin, & Cao, 2008). MOOCs, on the surface, appear ready to meet this challenge, but the question of feasibility may lie outside of their realm of control. Ultimately for such learning modalities to become truly advantageous, they need to be accepted by the 21st century economy. It seems that some progress is being made in this regard, as some employers who struggle to find candidates with the necessary skill set to be an effective employee, are turning to individuals who have completed coursework, through MOOCs like edX (Carapezza, 2017). With viability and legitimacy seemingly underway, MOOCs seem like at the very least a supplemental source of learning/upskilling. Team Awesome Sauce plans to continue learning firsthand the true value of MOOCs, edX in particular as we audit various courses currently offered.

 

References

Carapezza, K. (2017, February 15) These Top Schools Are Offering Big Savings On Master’s Degrees, But There’s A Catch. NPR Ed. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/ed/2017/02/15/504478472/how-to-get-20-000-off-the-price-of-a-masters-degree

 

Hutchison, M., Tin, T. & Cao, Y. (2008). Chapter 8: “In-Your-Pocket” and “On-the-Fly:” Meeting the Needs of Today’s New Generation of Online Learners with Mobile Learning Technology. In T. Anderson (Ed.), The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 201-219). Edmonton, AB: AU Press.

Published by

Marshall

I am a high school Social Studies, and English Language Arts teacher. I have a strong interest in e-learning, and want to see where this interest will take me as far as career paths are concerned.

2 thoughts on “Exploring Modalities: A Reflection by Team Awesome Sauce”

  1. Greetings Team Awesome Sauce! You put forward many compelling questions in this blog post. Team MOOCtastic (Angie, Candace, Karen, Todd) has provided some comments and further questions on several of your questions below. We are examining Coursera as a MOOC-provider, and some of our input comes from that perspective in comparison with EdX.

    TEAM AWESOME SAUCE QUESTIONS:

    1. These services bypass the traditional economy in the same way that MOOCs bypass traditional education, but how can such an enterprise be economically sustainable?

    • According to wikipedia, EdX is a not-for-profit organization founded by Harvard and MIT, while Coursera is a for-profit company funded by venture capitalism. Both companies began by offering courses for free. We haven’t looked into edX’s economic sustainability model, but since inception, Coursera has implemented a price model which puts certificates, grading, and some course materials or activities behind a paywall.

    2. If such platforms continue to gain traction, will they make the brick and mortar universities redundant?

    • Traditional university and MOOCs currently have different primary functions and goals. Is there not room for both?

    • What would MOOCs have to accomplish in order to make traditional universities redundant?

    3. Who will actually recognise an EdX degree, and given the flexible pace and restricted access to university research databases, how can the quality of inquiry possibly compare to similar offerings in more traditional educational settings?

    • There are testimonials on various pages within Coursera which say completing these MOOCs makes learners more appealing to employers. Does edX have similar advertising?

    • Have you found any research-backed information about whether MOOC credentials are recognized?

    4. An obvious advantage to learning in this manner is accessibility. EdX courses are available 24-7, restricted only by internet connectivity, but what other benefits are there to this modality?

    • Another benefit we recognize is exposure to courses from many universities as opposed to only one. Perhaps one day MOOCs will accomplish the ability to grant legitimate multi-institution degrees.

    5. From a pedagogical standpoint, we are curious to understand what constitutes best practice for course design and delivery?

    • Coursera tends to use a series of short video lectures. One might assume this is deliberate and based on cognitive load theory. It would be interesting to know which delivery methods EdX uses and why.

    6. The opportunity to cater to individual learners seems vast, and we hypothesise that such modalities offer a decent coverage of content knowledge, but how effective are MOOCs at developing the soft skills of human interaction and collaboration, which are increasingly vital in the 21st century economy?

    • Human interaction is a challenge with all online learning, but there is an attempt to partially address this in MOOCs through online forums for the learners to interact.

    7. We wonder who this modality is targeting, and what uses are not currently being utilised, but that may be available in similar applications?

    • MOOCs were originally lauded as a tool for granting university education access to everyone, such as to those less-fortunate. According to Shah (2018), the primary users appear to instead be largely comprised of those who already have post-secondary education (lifelong learners) who want to learn as a hobby or to enhance work skills, and the current target market is geared more towards paying users (although Coursera has financial aid available). Coursera’s website offers companies the ability to host workplace training, and the organization is constantly adding to their list of real university degrees which they host (for a fraction of the cost of a classroom post-secondary degree in the USA, but are still very expensive). Based on emails targeted at Coursera learners which advertise these degrees, the free courses appear to act as a corral for recruiting students to these programs.

    8. If qualifications become recognised as providing credit, how can EdX be assured the student is the student?

    • We are unaware of how edX ensures student-identity, but Coursera’s credentialing is tied to real-life identities of learners through key-stroke recognition and face recognition software which matches government-issued photo ID to images captured by web cams (Maas, Heather, Do, Brandman, Koller, & Ng, 2014). There is also an honour code system where you check a box to declare you are you before you take a quiz.

    GREAT WORK so far Team Awesome Sauce! Best wishes for the rest of this assignment, course, and program from your friends on Team MOOCtastic: Karen Maeers, Angie Maksymetz, Candace Parsons, and Todd Pezer

    References

    Maas, A., Heather, C., Do, C. T., Brandman, R., Koller, D., & Ng, A. (2014). Offering verified credentials in massive open online courses: MOOCs and technology to advance learning and learning research (Ubiquity symposium). Ubiquity, 2014(May), 2.

    Shah, D. (2018, January 22). A Product at Every Price: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2017 [Web log post]. Retrieved April 13, 2018, from https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2017/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *