LRNT 622 – Unit 3 Activity 1: Theoretical Frameworks

A theoretical framework that I am interested in learning more about is the e-learning systems theory framework, since it has components such as “people, technology, and services” (Aparicio, Bacao & Oliveira, 2016, p. 301) which are what I can use to base my DLRCP on.  This theoretical framework explains the complex interactions between (a) the people which have been identified as the learners, the content providers and other stakeholders, (b) the technology which is used to deliver the content, the communication and the collaboration, and (c) the services which is the e-learning activities based on pedagogical models and instructional strategies (Aparicio, Bacao & Oliveira, 2016).

Some questions that come to mind are:

  • Is this theoretical framework the most appropriate to guide my research?
  • Is this the only theoretical framework that I can use for the basis of my project?

Here is a diagram of the e-learning systems’ theoretical framework as shown in Aparicio, Bacao & Oliveira (2016).

I look forward to receiving your feedback and comments.

 

Reference:

Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). An e-Learning Theoretical Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (1),
292–307.

4 thoughts on “LRNT 622 – Unit 3 Activity 1: Theoretical Frameworks”

  1. This looks like an interesting theory on how all three elements relate to one another. My one comment would be that it was interesting to see that students and employees listed as customers. We’ve had that conversation a few times with instructors who have come from industry and while they often look at students as customers, it doesn’t seem like it’s the right distinction.

    I’m interested to see further how you put all this together and if you have thought about that description for students.

    1. Hi Jeff,
      Thank you for your comment.
      Yes, I thought that both terms of customers and suppliers were odd. Felt like it was a business plan. I always feel that terms should be appropriate in any context. Thus, I would not use those terms in my project.
      Cheers!

  2. Hi Joyce,
    What an interesting framework you have landed on. To follow up with you and Jeff, I have found that education is becoming more and more like a business. So much so, that we have had our superintendent introduced as the superintendent and CEO of the district.
    I too wondered if I should or could have more than one Framework. I am often one to want to have all the balls in the air, but after receiving my comments on my blog, it seems like one may help keep me grounded and more focused. It really just depends on where you see your research going. However, knowing your context a bit, the three sections of this framework may work really well for you to focus on. It just depends if it is going to help to answer your questions. Sorry, not that helpful, but I am excited to see what you come up with.
    Amanda

  3. Hi Joyce,
    This is an interesting framework. However, I am not familiar with it, but from what I have researched and what you have explained seems quite fitting as a basis to guide your research. Utilizing the three ‘actors’ and their interplay. I look forward to see what your research unfolds. All the best.
    Phyz

Leave a Reply to j1wimmer Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *