My Chosen Theoretical Framework

Photo by Brooke Cagle on Unsplash

Introduction

As I prepare to begin researching for the literature review associated with my Applied Research Project (ARP), my first task was to identify a theoretical framework to focus my studies.  After considering a series of frameworks that would have been appropriate, I’ve chosen to settle on Malcolm Knowles’ (1973) Adult Learning Theory (ALT).  Since the topic of my research concerns the orientation and training of novice part-time faculty in higher education, a group that will likely be exclusively adults, so this seemed to me like a reasonable choice.  Throughout this post I plan to provide a description of the theory and summarize the five main elements.

Adult Learning Theory

In a nutshell, ALT assumes that adult learners are self-directed and intrinsically motivated individuals and should be treated as collaborators in both the planning and execution of their own learning.  Knowles (1973) observed that as we mature from infancy to adulthood, we grow increasingly independent and our need to have our learning directed from external forces decreases.  He went on to note that as a result, as learners mature, they should be allowed to have more and more control over their own education, but that this is frequently not the case.  The increasing disparity represented by the maturation of the learner and their infantilization through externally imposed pedagogy “produces tension, resistance, resentment, and often rebellion in the individual” (Knowles, 1973, p. 45).  Therefore we must be sure to include the adult learner in the planning and execution of their learning wherever possible.  Additionally, Darden (2014) asserted that the adult learner is motivated intrinsically by real world goals.  They have a tendency to seek out new skills and knowledge when presented with obstacles in life which they need to overcome.  As a result, adults take courses to fulfill an immediate need, as opposed to children, who typically learn under the assumption of delayed utility.  With this in mind, we need to be working with adults to assist them in the development of learning outcomes that meet their immediate needs.

5 Elements of ALT

In her article on the application of ALT to distance learning, Maria Garavani (2015) outlined five main elements associated with the theory.  I look to summarize them in the paragraphs to follow.

Planning

A crucial element of ALT is that learners be included in the planning process of any learning activity in which they expect to take part.  Associated with this idea, Gravani (2015) noted “that people tend to feel uncommitted to any decision or activity that they feel is imposed on them without having a chance to influence it” (p. 178).  So, in an effort to get an adult’s buy-in on an educational undertaking, they should be included in the conversation right from the very beginning of the instructional design process.

Needs Diagnosis

As individuals mature, the learning they undertake is increasingly motivated by their social needs (Knowles, 1973).  That is to say that they’re learning is directed by real-life needs, such as a new task at work or a new hobby.  Therefore, coming into a learning experience, adults typically already have a strong understanding of the nature of their own needs, so it makes sense for an educator to consult with that individual to get a sense of their perspective.  Gravani (2015) went on to differentiate between Felt Needs, those needs that the learner believes they require, and Ascribed Needs, those needs that the learners’ organization believes they require.

Design

As educators and/or instructional designers look to develop learning activities that align with ALT, they should assume that adults will have a significant level of responsibility for their own learning, and should build activities “around the concept of self-directed learning” (Gravani, 2015, p. 179).  At the same time, Knowles (1973) pointed out that unlike children, adults are individuals with a wealth of experience and knowledge. Their learning should be done in such a way that leverages that experience and analyzes the way in which it influences the new knowledge they seek to acquire.

Climate

Gravani (2015) argued that the setting of an environment that’s conducive to learning is probably the most impactful element associated with ALT.  In that context, Knowles (1973) differentiated between the physical and psychological environments.  The physical environment consists of factors such as the availability of a well lit and ventilated work space, a comfortable seat, and any other such provision to make the learner comfortable.  Additionally, learners should be provided with easy access to learning resources, both technical and human.  The psychological environment on the other hand consists of such considerations as a supportive learning group built on trust, honesty, integrity, and mutual respect.  As a learner’s physical and psychological needs are met, they’re free to focus their attention on their learning.

Evaluation

Finally, Gravani (2015) outlined four levels of evaluation to be considered.

      • Reaction Evaluation – An analysis of the learner’s experience with the program as they are experiencing it.
      • Learning Evaluation – an analysis of the new knowledge of skill the learner has acquired as a result of being exposed to the program.
      • Behaviour Evaluation – An analysis of the changes made to the learner’s actions as a result of exposure to the program.
      • Results Evaluation – Data gathered from the course and maintained by the organization.

References

Darden, D. C. (2014). Relevance of the Knowles theory in distance education. Creative Education, 05(10), 809–812. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.510094

Gravani, M. N. (2015). Adult learning in a distance education context: theoretical and methodological challenges. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2014.982728

Knowles, M. (1973). The adult learner: A neglected species (L. Nadler, Ed.). Gulf Publishing Company. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED084368.pdf

Spreading the Message

Photo by Toa Heftiba on Unsplash

The purpose of this post is to consider how I will disseminate the results of my upcoming Advanced Research Project (ARP) once I’ve completed the work.  This is an important topic, as the determination of the audience for my message will absolutely have an impact on how I compose the document and will also provide direction on the nature of the research.

As a quick overview, the objective of my ARP is to explore the literature on the onboarding process of novice part-time faculty for online and blended learning in higher education and their preparedness to perform that task effectively, then to provide recommendations on the improvement of that system.  With this in mind, the immediate audience for my research are the Human Resource and subsequently the Organizational Development and Learning (ODL) department at various post-secondary institutions.  The latter department varies in name depending on the institution, but the goal is to communicate with those people who are responsible for the on-boarding and training of newly hired part-time faculty.

In order to communicate with this group, I will begin by conversing directly with the people responsible for this task at the college at which I’m currently employed.  I have an existing relationship with the department and have already informed them of the nature of my upcoming project and they’ve expressed interest in hearing the results.  So, this should be a fairly simple process of arranging a meeting and presenting the ARP to them once it’s been completed.  In terms of communicating with other institutions, there are a number of avenues I might pursue to build a larger audience.  There is the annual Higher Education Summit and the Canada International Conference on Education.  These are two examples of high profile gatherings of respected, innovative, and forward thinking educators who are invested in the improvement of teaching practices.  For both of these examples, I would need to apply to be included as a speaker at these events, requiring me to develop a presentation that is both concise and compelling.

Another organization with which I could communicate is eCampusOntario, a respected provincial organization dedicated to the improvement of online education in Ontario, the province in which I reside.  Again, I have an existing  relationship with this organization as an Empowered Educator, a certification obtained through the completion of course work developed by that group.  eCampusOntario has contacts with ODL departments throughout the province and this would be an excellent resource for gaining access to decision makers in the onboarding process for part-time faculty.

This is just an early look at how I might disseminate the results of my ARP.  As I explore the topic, avenues I haven’t considered may present themselves and they’ll need to be evaluated on their own merit on whether a shift in my topic, or my audience would benefit my objective or not.  We’ll see!