Accessibility Note: Some components of the interactive infographic hyperlinked below may be difficult to view without increasing the zoom on your browser, or may be inaccessible if you are using a screen reader. This is my first time using this tool (the free version of Genially) and I would appreciate your feedback below. I have included the full text from the infographic at the bottom of this post if that is more convenient for you.
Andrea Evans Smith (she/her) – January 14, 2024
LRNT 524 – Royal Roads University MALAT Program
Design Principles which guide my learning design
Reflections of an evolving Instructional Designer in Corporate Learning
As we reach the end of LRNT524 (Innovation, Design, and Learning Environments) I’ve been challenged to reflect the design principles which guide my learning practice. Here are the design principles I’ve found most relevant to me and my particular view of adult learning as an instructional designer and adult learning enthusiast working in Corporate Learning.
Accessible Design
(Click Here hyperlink opens the following):
- UDL benefits all learners!
- Accessibility can benefit everyone, not just learners with disabilities, neurodiversity, or learning differences. I want my designs to employ Universal Design for Learning standards by planning proactively, enabling access, providing flexibility in learning choices, and providing clear instructions (Takacs et al., 2022, p. 37). Designing with UDL standards in mind from the beginning of any learning project just makes the most sense to me.
Diverse & Inclusive
(Click Here hyperlink opens the following):
- Reflecting our diverse society
- As we learned from Heaster-Ekholm (2020), digital learning has the ability to meet the needs of diverse audiences when those designing the learning experiences carefully consider the colonial systems and biases which may be unconsciously built into instructional design models (p. 50). For me as an ID, creating inclusive content which reflects the diversity of my learners is mandatory. This can include having a diverse spectrum of individuals in your imagery, and including a variety of voices and perspectives in the people who contribute to your content. One area I want to continue to grow is better understanding indigenous knowledge frameworks so I can evaluate my own colonial biases.
Tech-Enabled
(Click Here hyperlink opens the following):
- Modern solutions for hybrid work
- I believe digital learning solutions make sense in modern corporate learning as it allows learning teams to reach both remote workers and hybrid ones who spend some time in the office. Prioritizing digital solutions which help to connect these two employee groups also makes sense for building digital skills. Just as design thinking helps learners build digital literacy skills alongside problem-solving, collaboration, and creativity (Goldman et al., 2012, p. 17), making learning enabled by digital methods supports learner resiliency by exposing them to a variety of technical tools.
Open to Failure
(Click Here hyperlink opens the following):
- Experiment and be open to honest failure
- Approaching problems with an openness to “honest failure” was something I heard about at work several years back and haven’t forgotten about since. I like this concept of honest failure as it allows you to experiment with new ideas or technologies, take risks, assess their effectiveness, and be willing to adapt as needed the next time you try it. In practice with learning design this aligns best with an agile approach where the instructional designer asks learners to test out different iterations of a learning solutions through rapid prototyping (Svihla, 2018, p. 300), collects their feedback, and decides whether the prototype needs adjustments to be successful or perhaps if the experiment was not successful. For example, I’ve never used this particular infographic tool (Genially) before, but I’m testing it out and will use this prototype to evaluate if I try it again.
Practical Application
(Click Here hyperlink opens the following):
- Solidifying learning with practice
- We’re well past the point where educators are seen as the “sage on the stage”, delivering lectures with information so important learners are expected to accept and memorize it. Instead, learning in our modern age is participatory and active, requiring learners to practice what they’ve learned to help commit it to longer-term memory. In developing a model for implementing effective microlearning, Dolasinski & Reynolds (2020) embedded learners having an opportunity to practice their new skills as a critical step to the learning content implementation. Giving our learners the opportunity to practice new skills they’re learning through simulation, experimentation, discussion, case studies, or other practical applications is key to effective adult learning practices.
Collaborative
(Click Here hyperlink opens the following):
- Involving stakeholders and learners
- I don’t believe that designing learning should just be up to the instructors or learning designers, but it should rather be a collaborative process where stakeholders and learners are involved, engaged, and excited about the end product. I’m energized by all the great ideas Stanford’s d.School Design Thinking Bootleg (2018) and I am already thinking of ways I can incorporate some of these approaches into stakeholder engagement or needs analysis workshops. Having stakeholders and learners engaged in corporate learning makes it easier to support change management around the change and find ways you can measure the impact of your learning solutions.
What do you think?
- Is there anything different you think I should consider in my assessment above? How do your personal Design Principles differ from mine? Please comment below so we can keep learning from each other.
- Infographic template and images attributed to Genially (app.genial.ly free license)
References
Design Thinking Bootleg. (2018). Stanford d.School Bootleg. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/design-thinking-bootleg
Dolasinski, M. J., & Reynolds, J. (2020). Microlearning: A New Learning Model. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(3), 551-561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020901579
Goldman, S., Carroll, M. P., Kabayadondo, Z., Cavagnaro, L. B., Royalty, A. W., Roth, B., Roth, B., Kwek, S. H., & Kim, J. (2012). Assessing d.learning: Capturing the Journey of Becoming a Design Thinker. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research: Measuring Performance in Context (pp. 13–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31991-4_2
Heaster-Ekholm, K. L. (2020). Popular Instructional Design Models: Their Theoretical Roots and Cultural Considerations. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 16(3), 50–65. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1275582
Svihla, V. (2018). Design Thinking and Agile Design. Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology, 295–309. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/design_thinking_and_agile_design
Takacs, D. S., Zhang, J., Lee, H., Truong, L., & Smulders, D. (2022). A Comprehensive Guide to Applying Universal Design for Learning. Justice Institute of British Columbia. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/jibcudl/