Thoughts on “George Veletsianos on Research” Podcast

Posted on Aug 15, 2017 | 2 comments


Steve asked the question, “When you undertake a research project, what are the first steps you take to get things rolling? (Getting the whole process moving seems very overwhelming.)”

That is a terrific question, and I appreciated Dr. Veletsianos’ discussion.

image of road leading off into the distance with START written over the road

Gerd Altmann, Pixabay, CC0

There were two comments he made that particularly resonated with me (paraphrased):

  • A project doesn’t happen in a vacuum, and sometimes there are years of thought involved before it happens.

I was wagging my head in agreement when he explained this idea. Of course. It’s unlikely that anyone would do a significant amount of research, much less a full-blown study, without having a substantial interest in the topic. I know there are topical areas that may be of greater or lesser interest in themselves, but that’s not the same as embarking on a formal research effort where you’re seeking to extend the body of knowledge on a particular topic.

On a personal level, I found this idea very comforting. I am not a linear thinker. It’s far more likely for me to have an idea that bubbles and percolates, with many of those bubbles fizzing off into their own explorations before I can express it in any sort of structured way.

  • For a new project, or one based on prior work, understanding the big idea leads to formulating the research question.

George gave a few example questions: What am I trying to answer? How are people feeling about x? Why are people doing y? What is the relationship between variable a and variable b?

The concept of letting the big idea lead you to a research question was the prime takeaway for me. I have always had the instinctive need to research whatever I’m doing—whether that’s understanding the building code requirements for a fireplace installation, or how AES 256-bit encryption works, or how parathyroid hormones work in canines compared to humans. I have realized that I placed “academic research” on some sort of mythical pedestal, and hopefully, with enough research and reflection, I’ll see that it’s not a mystery per se, but a fascinating new area to explore and understand.

References

Altmann, Gerd. (Photographer). (2014). Image of Road [digital image]. Retrieved from https://pixabay.com/photo-1668916/

Veletsianos, G. (Author). (2017, August 10). George Veletsianos on Research [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from 

2 Comments

  1. Hi Donna. I think the saying “Rome was not built in a day” fits well here. I like how you pulled Dr. Veletsianos’ statement on how research can be years in the making before it formally begins. I think we have to keep in mind that in most cases, researchers won’t start with a fully thought-out ‘perfect’ research question, but the process is organic and the question should be molded based on new information and circumstances. Research is not always a linear path, which should suit people with non-linear thinking like yourself.

    Post a Reply
    • How true! Your description of research as organic makes a lot of sense to me, and something I’ll incorporate into my overall impression of this massive subject.

      Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *