Kristin Beeby, Jean-Pierre Joubert, Sandra Norum, and myself have spent the last few weeks working on the development of a week-long learning module focusing on managing student conflict in an online learning environment. Our most recent task was the development of a facilitation plan that would encourage our learners to engage with one another with a goal of deep and meaningful learning. We’ve planned to use Adobe Spark as the hub for our learning module and have created a series of pages to direct our learners’ attention between web-based resources, a discussion forum conducted on Mattermost, and a synchronous session in Collaborate.
Learning Outcomes
Our resource has one main learning outcome with a series of sub-outcomes which include the following…
-
-
-
- Describe and reflect on best practices for managing conflict in online learning environments.
-
- Identify strategies for preventing student-to-student conflict online.
- Describe strategies to manage existing conflict
- Recognize and foster healthy conflict
-
- Describe and reflect on best practices for managing conflict in online learning environments.
-
-
Community of Inquiry
In addition to the learning outcomes, our plan looks to encourage the development of the three presences in a Community of Inquiry in the following ways…
Social Presence
-
-
-
- Introduction email to be sent to the group on the Sunday leading into the resource.
- Introduction video to be presented to learners at the beginning of the module.
- A discussion forum on Mattermost which will include an initial post and responses with a focus on acknowledgement, reinforcement, and challenges.
- A synchronous discussion and debrief hosted on Collaborate.
-
-
Cognitive Presence
-
-
-
- Accessing the content available in the provided resources.
- Engaging in the perspectives of co-learners through initial posts and responding.
- Reflection on the content through the week and revisiting case studies by applying new knowledge.
-
-
Teaching Presence
-
-
-
- Introduction videos and team bios provide learners with an understanding of the personas of the facilitators
- Providing course expectations and a behaviour policy provide structure and targets for learners.
- Asynchronous discussion facilitation on Mattermost allow facilitators to engage with learners and support the discourse to direct learning toward the outcomes.
- A synchronous session hosted on Collaborate provides facilitators an opportunity to engage with learners with a goal of encouraging the communication of reflection.
-
-
Facilitation Plan
Attached below is a draft plan for how we look to interact with learners throughout the week using a combination of tools including Adobe Spark, Mattermost, and Collaborate. We look forward to continuing to develop our plan leading up to the launch of our facilitation week, beginning September 27.
| Day | Goal | Facilitator Task | Learner Task |
| DAY 1 (Sept. 26) |
Asynchronous | Introduction to module through email | Read the email and familiarize yourself with the resource and confirm access to Mattermost discussion forum. |
| DAY 2 (Sept. 27) All (Spark page Kristin) |
Asynchronous | Land Acknowledgment
Outline Expectations/ Plan Course navigation Introduction (recorded introduction, discussion) Present case studies Initiate Mattermost discussion |
Adhere to expectations for discussion post on Mattermost
View page/content on Spark Prompts: What was the nature of the conflict? How could it have been prevented? How could it be addressed? |
| DAY 3 (Sept. 28) Christopher |
Asynchronous | Present Prevention Methods
Respond and recognize Mattermost discussion |
Complete initial discussion post, outlining how you would respond to one of the four case studies as an educator
View page/content on Spark |
| DAY 4 (Sept. 29) Sandra |
Asynchronous | Present types of Conflict and Causes (Video examples)Respond and recognize Mattermost discussionScaffolding prompt to reignite and redirect the discourse however necessaryRemind learners to prepare for the synchronous discussion |
View page/content on Spark |
| DAY 5 (Sept. 30) Jean-Pierre |
Asynchronous | Addressing conflicts
Respond and recognize Mattermost discussion |
View page/content on Spark
Prepare to share learning in a synchronous session |
| DAY 6 (Oct. 1) All |
Synchronous on Collaborate 5pm PT |
Case study 1 (post) and reflections
Respond and recognize Mattermost discussion |
View page/content on Spark
Complete response to a minimum of one of your classmates’ initial posts Participate in synchronous session |
| DAY 7 (Oct. 2) Kristin |
Asynchronous | Provide follow-up resources and other activities
Provide recap Offer gratitude for participation |
View page/content on Spark
Extend learning as desired |
Synchronous Session Lesson Plan
(5pm Pacific Time, October 1)
In order to make the most of our learners’ time during our synchronous session on Collaborate, we plan to follow through with the lesson plan attached below.
| Time | What | How | Details |
| 5 minutes | Greetings / Check-in | Synchronous conversation with teacher presence | Greet students as they enter Collaborate room
Ask for feedback of the week |
| 2 min | Land acknowledgment | Stated | Anishinaabe, Haudenoshaunee, and Lenape peoples of Southwestern Ontario
Katzie First Nation and the Kwantien First Nation of the Fraser Valley Wolastoqiylk (Maliseet) and Mi’kmaq peoples Syilx people of the Okanagan |
| 2 min | Outline plan for the session | Stated/slide | |
| 1 min | Break / transition | ||
| 5 min | Review key ideas | Slide / discussion | Share one or two highlights from each day/topic
Ask for feedback on what was most valuable learning for students |
| 30 min | Check for understanding | Discuss each case student.
Offer best practices |
Possible discussion questions:
What was the nature of the conflict? Describe how you would change your initial approach… and if not, why? What lessons did you take away from your co-learners’ posts? What could we add to our “tips” and “resources”? (Call on learners who addressed the case study for Mattermost discussion) If limited for time: Ask learners which case study was the most challenging and discuss that one |
| 5 min | Question period | Check for questions | Monitor video and chat in Collaborate |