My plan when I enrolled in the MALAT program was to learn how to create better educational experiences for my students by merging modern thinking and technology into the curriculum. The first week of LRNT 521, Digital Learning Environments, Networks, Communities, has shown me that curriculum design is messy. Some of my takeaways from the symposium sessions include thoughts on neurodiversity and culture and the effect they have on program design. As Dr. Chris Huffam pointed out in his session titled, “Common Problems Encountered and Lessons Learned in Building Training Solutions: A Multidisciplinary Perspective”, you need to know your audience.
On Tuesday, April 7, Mary Burgess gave a presentation entitled, “Rethinking Participation: Neurodiversity and Inclusion in Digital Learning Communities”, where she talked about the need to audit each course to see if they include and respect all participants. The goal of the audit is to make sure the course meets the needs of all, is available to all, students feel comfortable in the learning environment and are safe enough to participate and ask questions. During her talk, my interpretation of the term neurodivergent shifted from, those with tested and identified variances, to all of us being somewhere on the scale. If we consider each of us as having unique neural pathways and processing information in our own individual ways, it then forces us to consider how to make the information we are presenting digestible by all. It comes back to knowing your audience.
The idea of culture and how it affects the transfer of knowledge becomes more important when you consider the definition of the term. “Culture is the shared set of beliefs, values, customs, behaviors, and artifacts that characterize a group or society. It is learned, not inherited, encompassing language, religion, traditions, and arts that shape how people perceive and interact with the world. Culture is dynamic, constantly evolving over time.” AI Overview gathered from,( Frontiers for Young Minds +3 ). Huffam in his talk on Friday April 10, gave several examples of projects that failed, or at least stumbled due to a lack of cultural understanding of the intended audience. The culture that a person comes from can shape how they perceive and react with the world around them, this then presents a challenge when designing instructional material and processes. When you think about your audience coming from different cultures and being at different points on the neural cognition scale, it becomes a messy process of designing a course that can reach everyone.
This past week has introduced me to some new and interesting ideas and opened some doors that need to be investigated. I would like to thank the near to graduating class for the very informative and helpful conversation at the meet and greet Wednesday evening. As I progress through the MALAT program I hope remember Dr. Russ Wilde’s suggestion to “be humble, you are not always correct, no matter how sure you are”.
References
Burgess, M. (2026, April 7) Rethinking Participation: Neurodiversity and Inclusion in Digital Learning Communities [Webinar]. MALAT 2026 Virtual Symposium. Royal Roads University. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mQS_o-C_jO2taghriJfXKDsgfa1fUL0mTDMo2JTGSJc/edit?tab=t.0
Huffam, C. (2026, April 10) Common Problems Encountered and Lessons Learned in Building Training Solutions: A Multidisciplinary Perspective [Webinar]. MALAT 2026 Virtual Symposium. Royal Roads University. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mQS_o-C_jO2taghriJfXKDsgfa1fUL0mTDMo2JTGSJc/edit?tab=t.0
MALAT 2024 Cohort (2026, April 8) Meet and Greet – MALAT Cross Cohort Meet Up [Webinar]. MALAT 2026 Virtual Symposium. Royal Roads University. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mQS_o-C_jO2taghriJfXKDsgfa1fUL0mTDMo2JTGSJc/edit?tab=t.0
Wilde, R. (2026, April 9) Connecting with Dr. Russ Wilde [Webinar]. MALAT 2026 Virtual Symposium. Royal Roads University. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mQS_o-C_jO2taghriJfXKDsgfa1fUL0mTDMo2JTGSJc/edit?tab=t.0
14 April 2026 at 9:02 am
Hi Ron,
I enjoyed reading your post and it brings to mind some reading I did yesterday for Unit 2. David S. White and Alison LeCornu argue that analysing “perceived behaviours of learners by categorising them into types” (Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement, 2026) makes it easier to communicate learner characteristics, but the practice also has some drawbacks such as “the inflexibility of types, as well as the tendency to box individuals into one type or another, overlooking contradictory evidence”.
At the risk of sounding pseudophilosophical, I’ll put forward that life is a spectrum and so are people, some labels that we give people are binary, but most only serve to communicate a tendency. In fact, many psychiatric diagnoses serve the purpose of identifying when a characteristic has become strong enough that it impedes the patient from living life the way they wish to. Sometimes, it’s best not to diagnose a condition because the label can have negative consequences.
Thank you for the interesting read.
Claire
Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement. (2026). Firstmonday.Org.
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/3171/3049#:~:text=Prensky%20himself%20has,of%20different%20types.
15 April 2026 at 7:35 pm
Thank you for your comments Claire. Until recently I have not given much thought to effect that labels can can have on people. Or what normal means. The more I teach, the more I begin to notice the various learning styles of my students. So far there have been a few students that have asked for a quiet room to write exams in or extra time because of language issues, only one with a history and documentation from high school. All of them eventually rejoined the class once they became comfortable with those around them. I think that if we treat everyone as equals, making sure we account for their various learning styles, we will get a good result.
18 April 2026 at 5:38 pm
I like the approach you have taken in your own teaching, Ron. With what you’ve described, I think you are providing a safe space for individuals to identify with a label or recognize a need that they have, without the pressure and potential harms of a proper label.