Revisiting My 3-2-1 Blog Post

As a final learning activity and my last MLAT blog post (insert cheering emoji), we are meant to revisit our original blog post from the beginning of the course.

3- Thoughts, Ideas or Feelings 

My original thoughts surrounding facilitation have stayed the same in some respects. There is a lot of backend work and thought into creating an online learning environment that has multiple access and learning opportunities. This was reconfirmed in my team’s approach to our facilitation project and the building of all of the additional accessible options we placed in our facilitation week, as well as providing multiple means of expression in each activity. I still feel valve control is an important element in facilitation and feel as though all the teams in the past 4 weeks have done a great job of pacing the activities in their week. I still feel that to cultivate a supportive learning community, facilitators must ensure that learners feel safe to engage. This was evident in our facilitation week because our topic was one that required respect and sensitivity where learners felt safe exploring and expressing their feelings and thoughts. Even as a team of facilitators we were hesitant, but Leah created a safe space for us to explore the topic so that we could create that space for the learners. Based on the meaningful reflections we received I feel as though we were successful in this respect and it confirms that safety is needed for active participation.

2Questions about Digital Facilitation 

I posed two questions:

  1. What are some best practices/ recommendations for engaging with students to receive mid-term feedback that anyone has used?
  2. Does anyone have any effective strategies or recommendations for dropping choices when you have prescribed learning outcomes/ content enforced by the administration or standard testing that students must undertake?  How do you cover it all when you can’t cover it all?

The second question did not get answered. However, the first one did based on varying methods used in the online sessions. I found the synch sessions were a great space for facilitators to check in with students and see how they were doing with the materials and the mid- point check in was visible. Saying that, if the learning environment does not have the capacity for the synch session like ours did, what would people use? I would still like to see what people might recommend.

1- Simile

Photo source: https://www.teclasap.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/finger-in-every-pie.jpg

Facilitators do have their hands in many pies- this has not changed. It was evident in all of our weeks of facilitation, from planning and managing the week for our cohorts as a team, to creating the content, to facilitating the week all while handling our work and families and anything else we have going on. It’s ALOT of pies. Also, when we have teams we have support in the process. We have the advantage of splitting the work and responding to every student, but the reality is in a normal setting, we cannot always do this nor is it necessarily needed. By setting the tone as a facilitator in terms of expectations of engagement and timing, learners know what to expect and facilitators can better manage the amount of pies they are dealing with.

LRNT- Assignment 1

Context

The premise of this task was to create an infographic that depicts strategies using the Community of Inquiry framework (COI) in our learning contexts. I am an educator in online and hybrid post-secondary environments with an international student population. There is a vast difference between the students regarding socioeconomic status, literacy competencies (digital and prose), and language capacity that impact my design decisions, choices for engagement, and means for students to connect with the materials.

Link to Canava or a Link to a PDF version

The Infographic Explained

Teaching presence is placed at the top of the strategies because, without the intentional design of facilitating social and cognitive presences to achieve learning outcomes that are meaningful and valuable to the learner (Garrison et al., 2000), it would be difficult for learners to establish a social or cognitive presence on their own accord. Social presence aids the discourse and reflection needed for cognitive presence (Garrison et al., 2000); thus, the strategies are placed in the descending order.

Teaching Presence

The strategies selected for teaching presence lend themselves to working with diverse student populations. Clear guidelines, samples, multiple resources and a consistent structure are required in an online learning environment (Garrison & Arbaugh, 2007). In my experience, giving students options and directing the pace of the content allows students to focus on learning and connecting with the materials in a manner that suits their needs and reduces the stress of trying to decipher what the instructor is expecting.

Social Presence

The strategies selected for social presence are designed to give students multiple options for engagement with one another and the instructor. The instructor can formally and informally encourage group cohesion while respecting cultural differences they may have surrounding sharing information and ideas. The instructor’s being accessible online is imperative to direct and support students (Boettcher, n.d.; Dunlap & Lowenthal, 2018) while monitoring and connecting with those who may need to be more active online to ensure they are both okay and comfortable with the materials.

Cognitive Presence

The strategies selected for cognitive presence represent varying ways the instructor can gauge if students exchange information, apply knowledge, and form new ideas, which Garrison and Arbaugh (2007) note are indicators of cognitive presence. Through synchronous and asynchronous activities that encourage reflection, exploration and exchange of ideas, students can apply their perspectives in a culturally relevant manner to the materials for deeper comprehension.

Conclusion

The recommended strategies in the infographic account for cultural differences and the needs of diverse learners who bring varying perspectives, skills, and experiences to the classroom. While they are not the only strategies for working with international students, they direct and cultivate a learning environment where people are encouraged to be themselves and are supported in the learning process, which is important for student success.

References

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Online Learning, 5(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875

Boettcher, J. V. (n.d.). The ten best practices for online learning. Design for Learning 2006-2022. Retrieved August 23, 2023, from http://designingforlearning.info/writing/ten-best-practices-for-teaching-online/

Bull, B. (2013, June 3). Eight roles of an effective online teacher. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/eight-roles-of-an-effective-online-teacher/

Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Online educators’ recommendations for teaching online: Crowdsourcing in action. Open Praxis, 10(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.721

Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6

Garrison, D., & Arbaugh, J. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001

Vaughn, N. D., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Garrison, D. R. (2013). Facilitation. In Teaching in blended learning environments: Creating and sustaining communities of inquiry. (pp. 45–61). Athabasca University Press. https://read.aupress.ca/read/teaching-in-blended-learning-environments/section/43261c4a-6d4c-44cf-8c7f-60bc306eb03a

Team Blue Facilitation Plan (Gill, Leah, Rebecca, Tim, Shazia)

Facilitation Week: September 24th-30th

Topic and Learning Objective  

Our team selected the topic of digital facilitation through an Indigenous knowledge lens to examine how Indigenous epistemologies and worldviews can be incorporated into digital facilitation. The learning outcome created for our facilitation week is as follows:

Reimagine digital learning environments where Indigenous epistemologies and worldviews are integrated through meaningful facilitation. 

This learning objective uses verb reimagine because it aligns with LaFever’s (2016) suggestion of supporting Indigenous ways of knowing by creating learning outcomes that are more holistic and include the spiritual domain of learning, such as empowerment. This approach supports using the Medicine Wheel, central to Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing, in learning design and facilitation.

Resources

The primary resource for the learners is the open textbook by Lake and Atkins (2021), Facilitating Online Learning with the 5Rs: Embedding Indigenous Pedagogy into the Online Space.  We will facilitate the course with the 5Rs embedded into the week. Resources that connect with the 5Rs: respect, reciprocity, relationships, relevance and responsibility will also be included as optional areas to explore. There is a combination of readings (open and RRU accessible), videos and podcasts to consider learning preferences and needs. We will also include a resource for our introduction Padlet based on MacGregor and Nelson’s (2022) surrounding land acknowledgements. 

Technology Choices

All technology and resources selected, are aimed to respond to the varying learners in the course. Moodle Innovate will be the main location for the week’s content, such as readings, resources, the schedule, and links to other activities. Primary communication will be via the Innovate forum, similar to our MLAT courses, with activity from each team member in the discussion. Other technologies we plan to use are Padlet for an introduction activity and Flip for our main activity during the week. We chose both for their versatility and interactivity because learners and facilitators can participate through video, audio, or written means. These technology options support choice and variety in a method of expression and provide opportunities for sharing through spoken dialogue, an important aspect of Indigenous oral tradition and history (Molenaar, 2020). Mentimeter will be used during the synchronous session due to its interactive capacity, ability to integrate resources into the presentation in one place and ease of use in a Zoom session.   

Schedule, Flow and Activities 

September 24th- Course opens in Moodle- Welcome, course overview, communication means conveyed. 

The introduction activity will be a Padlet map where learners are asked to pin themselves on the map, acknowledge the lands they reside on, and connect to those lands and the Indigenous peoples from there. The purpose of this activity is to begin to create community and align with both relationship, relevance and respect. A resource will be provided, and each team member will have their introduction posted before the week starts with examples: video or oral submissions with a photo encouraged. This activity could also be something that learners could sample and reimagine for their learning environments.

The main activity for the week will reside in Flip, where learners are free to explore at their convenience during the week. Each team member creates a short Flip page that speaks to one of the 5 Rs.  We will each provide a short video of the R and its meaning, with a transcript option and links to resources used for the content. Breaking up the activities is considered “valve control” (Bull, 2013) and gives the learners the to choose their path through the learning experience. This also speaks to reciprocity (Lake & Atkins, 2021) by “honouring the student’s voice and choice.” Each R will have a prompt discussion question in Flip where learners can engage in discussions and the topics they wish. 

Relationships

  • How do you feel about your role as an instructor or facilitator in this capacity? 
  • What strategies have you used or ideas that could support relationship-building between yourself and your learners in a digital learning environment? 

Respect

  • How can you integrate meaningful respect for Indigenous cultures and lands into digital facilitation practices?
  • How can you incorporate traditional territory acknowledgements into digital interactions with students and peers? 
  • Reflect on any experiences you have had or witnessed where Indigenous perspectives were integrated effectively into digital learning spaces.

Relevance 

  • What activities/exercises can you plan as an instructor to learn where students are coming from both physically and mentally? 
  • How can you incorporate real-world, local, or current topics/examples relevant to the Indigenous community into your lessons?

Reciprocity

  • What actions can you take in your learning environment to ensure learning is meaningful to each person while ensuring that each person’s voice, choice, culture and beliefs are respected and heard? 
  • Reflect on any experiences where you have felt heard as a learner, or as a facilitator you have gained from your learners.

Responsibility 

  • Can you share an example from your personal experience where the principle of responsibility was upheld or disregarded in an educational setting? 
  • How do you think a lack of responsibility on the part of instructors or learners affects the learning environment?

September 27th 5 pm Synchronous session- 60 minutes 

Lesson Topic: Supporting learning outcomes that reflect Indigenous epistemologies and world views

  • Check-in opener- How do you feel about the materials with the topic? How did the opening video make you feel?
  • Storytelling – inviting stories and experiences prompted by Leah 
  • Lesson: about switching from Bloom’s taxonomy to the medicine wheel and exploring the spiritual domain that supports Indigenous ways of knowing and brings a balance to curriculum design (LaFever, 2016).
  • Introduce a discussion about how those in the session can incorporate learning outcomes that reflect Indigenous epistemologies and world views in their practice
  • Close with expectations for the remainder of the week and explain the closing  activity

The closing activity reflection is in a Moodle forum where learners express their final thoughts via their preferred medium (written, video, audio) and choice of topic. Several prompts will be provided regarding reflection on the activities, what they learned, and how they reimagine their learning environments. They may also want to share how they plan to honour Truth and Reconciliation Day as it closes our week. 

COI Integration

Teaching

Teaching presence occurs when learners realize meaningful and educational learning outcomes through the design, facilitation, and direction of social and cognitive processes (Garrison et al., 2000). Our group intends to embrace this presence while aligning it to the 5 Rs, shaping a learning environment where learners are not just passive participants but active contributors, sharing their knowledge and insights. We will establish this presence by modeling effective communication, offering probing questions, and actively facilitating ethical discourse (Anderson, 2017). We also acknowledge that the teaching presence only sometimes comes from us as facilitators. Anderson (2017) found that the teaching presence can come from other members of the CoI, which can lead to enhanced learner satisfaction. Therefore, an indicator of a teaching presence will be the active and meaningful responses from other members of the CoI in our various activities.

Social

Developing social presence is crucial when considering using the 5 Rs to decolonize the learning environment, particularly to support the development of relationships. We desire to create a learning environment in which our learners can present themselves as real (Lalonde, 2020) and feel a sense of belonging within the community (Lake & Atkins, 2021). We will provide several opportunities for our learners to connect personally and engage in meaningful discourse through written, audio, and video formats in synchronous and asynchronous activities. Indicators of social presence that we will watch for include vulnerability, expression of ideas and feelings concerning the topic and learning activities, and thoughtful consideration and response to the expression of peers. 

Cognitive

Activities will be developed with clear guidelines, examples, and expectations (Anderson, 2018) aimed at providing class with opportunities to effectively develop higher-order thinking about the issues presented as a means to develop cognitive presence. The activities will be designed so that students are sharing their perspectives and reflections in shared space with opportunities to comment and ask questions of each other, moving from internal personal reflections, to place of discussion (Garrison et al., 2001). The activities will also be designed using a scaffolding approach to build on the information learned throughout the week allowing them to begin to integrate the learning into their own practice (Garrison et al., 2001). Indicators of cognitive presence will be the sharing of information and ideas through the synchronous session and activities and application of these discussions through final personal reflection.

Spiritual Presence 

Indigenous Knowledge Keeper Kerrie Moore described the importance of a holistic approach to learning when considering Indigenous Ways of Knowing in a learning environment (Werklund School of Education, 2018). She emphasized the spiritual self and the importance of expressing emotions and feelings about a subject rather than solely concentrating on cognitive or ‘thinking’ aspects. As such, we have added ‘spiritual presence’ as part of our CoI framework and will prompt our learners to express their feelings about topics during our facilitation week. Indicators of spiritual presence could be openness to understanding and expression of feelings as part of the learning process; however, this presence is more difficult to assess objectively.

References

Bull, B. (2013, June 3). Eight roles of an effective online teacher. Faculty Focus. https://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/eight-roles-of-an-effective-online-teacher/

Anderson, T. (2018, February 1). How communities of inquiry drive teaching and learning in the digital age. Contact North. https://teachonline.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/e newsletters/how_communities_of_inquiry_drive_teaching_and_learning_in_the_digital.pdf

Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 

Garrison, D., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing is distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15 (1), 7-23, DOI: 10.1080/08923640109527071

LaFever, M. (2016). Switching from Bloom to the Medicine Wheel: Creating learning outcomes that support indigenous ways of knowing in post-secondary education. Intercultural Education, 27(5), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2016.1240496

Lake, J., & Atkins, H. (2021). Facilitating online learning with the 5R’s: Embedding Indigenous pedagogy into the online space. Pressbooks. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/the5rsonline/

Lalonde, C. (2020, August 22). Facilitation in a community of inquiry [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Nv1bUZv5PLs?si=YzFu31sp3LQ1Lp4l  

McGregor, D., & Nelson, E. (2022). Reconciling relationships with the land through land acknowledgements. In (Ed.), Sacred civics (pp. 122–132). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003199816-12

Molenaar, C. (2020, October 30). Indigenous oral histories and primary sources. The Canadian Encyclopedia. https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/indigenous-oral-histories-and-primary-sources#:~:text=Oral%20histories%20play%20an%20integral,cultures%20in%20their%20own%20words

Werklund School of Education. (2018, March 19). Colonization [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVoAre8wIoc

LRNT- 528 – 3-2-1

3- Thoughts, Ideas or Feelings 

Online facilitation takes a lot of planning and building on the back end to ensure that all needs for access and opportunities for learning meet student needs while having those backup plans ready, as Dunlop and Lowenthal (2018) mention. This includes pivoting on the course of the mid-term feedback, conveying that adjustments are required to meet student needs, and speaking to the agility of the instructor. 

Effective facilitation must cultivate a supportive community where people feel safe to engage (Boettcher, n.d.; Bull, 2013; Dunlap & Lowenthal, 2018), which is missing in many online commercialised course offerings if we look at MOOCs and other online learning experiences/ programs. Yes, many can offer means to break down materials and offer quick, regular feedback (Bull, 2013; Dunlap & Lowenthal, 2018), but they need more capacity in many instances to have teacher presence or cultivate a community.  

“Valve control” (Boettcher, n.d.) is important.  Breaking up activities, content, resources and event assessments into smaller pieces to make the content more digestible and less daunting.  I appreciate it as a learner and can see why my students would, too. 

2- Questions about Digital Facilitation 

What are some best practices/ recommendations for engaging with students to receive mid-term feedback that anyone has used? I find- anonymous means, like surveys, get very little response, and discussions garner “it’s good” or “I’m okay” without constructive feedback.

Dunlop and Lowenthal (2018) speak to the time commitment of teaching online and not being afraid to drop content when you go online.  Does anyone have any effective strategies or recommendations for making these “drop” choices when you have prescribed learning outcomes/ content enforced by the administration or standard testing that students must undertake?  How do you cover it all when you can cover it all?

1- Simile

Online facilitators have their hands in many pies.

Photo source: https://www.teclasap.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/finger-in-every-pie.jpg

References

Boettcher, J. V. (n.d.). The ten best practices for online learning. Design for Learning 2006-2022. Retrieved August 23, 2023, from http://designingforlearning.info/writing/ten-best-practices-for-teaching-online/

Bull, B. (2013, June 3). Eight roles of an effective online teacher. Faculty Focushttps://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/online-education/eight-roles-of-an-effective-online-teacher/

Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2018). Online educators’ recommendations for teaching online: Crowdsourcing in action. Open Praxis10(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.1.721