Myrna Pokiak Design Principles Manifesto (click to view PDF)
![]()

A MALAT Student Blog
Myrna Pokiak Design Principles Manifesto (click to view PDF)
![]()
By Corie Houldsworth & Myrna Pokiak
Royal Roads University
LRNT 524: Innovation, Design and Learning Environments
Submitted to Lisa Gedak & Leeann Waddington
January 2, 2022
Introduction
Integration of Indigenous ways of knowing in a learning context was the focus of our design thinking challenge. We used the process described by the d.School Design Thinking Process, part of the course materials for LRNT 524. We challenged ourselves to radically reimagine the design of digital learning environments (DLEs) for Indigenous learners and realize the potential of critical instructional design in practice by closing the education gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students. Closing the education gap has been shown to have benefits for improved earnings potentials as well as reduced cultural dissonance (Howe, 2011). Our solutions, which we have termed revolution instead, includes three main points that we propose to test: access, story mining and preservation, and acceptance of oral traditions in academia.
Revolution One: Access
Access and reliable high speed internet is crucial for Indigenous learners to benefit from DLEs. Without reliable access, there will continue to be a lack of Indigenous users for a DLE. As Anthony & Keating highlighted, Australia has seen some progress and has shown how urban versus rural access is not simply a matter of physical access, “what is a positive force for non-Indigenous urban communities must also be good for remote Indigenous communities” (2013, p. 5, para 3). The cultural differences between people who live in urban versus rural settings must be taken into account when attempting to design DLEs.
In comparing internet access across Canada, it is valuable to view the Indigenous populations, with the highest percentage of Indigenous versus non-Indigenous (Figure 1), and compare with internet access across the same geographic regions (Figure 2). This comparison shows a true visual of limitations for regions with the highest Indigenous populations per capita across Canada and the inequality that continues to exist.
Figure 1
Percentage of the Indigenous population by Province/Territory
Note. The data are from Indigenous Services Canada, Government of Canada. (2020).
Figure 2
Internet Service in Canada
Note. The data are from Innovation, Science and Economic Development, Government of Canada (2019).
Radical ways to meet user’s needs for Access
Revolution Two: Mining the Elder Populations for their Stories
Judy Iseke and Sylvia Moore have worked to develop Métis storytelling as pedagogy and research practice (Iseke & Moore, 2013). Elders need not have access to technology themselves. This can be provided for them so that their learnings can be captured and used later, as Iseke and Moore did in their Presenting ourselves to/in the Museum project (Iseke & Moore, 2011).
Radical ways to meet user’s needs for Mining the Elder Populations for their Stories
Revolution Three: Working on Acceptance and Academy for Oral Traditions
Euro-centric educational models are not the only acceptable means of teaching. Oral traditions and their associated cultures of learning are valid alternatives (Iseke, 2013). Indigenous teaching traditions being studied by the Gabriel Dumont Institute and the Saskatchewan Urban Native Teacher Education Program (SUNTEP) (SUNTEP, 2013) are involving elders in education and focusing on supporting elders “to build relations and to create ethical space where learning and sharing can occur.” (Goulet et. al., 2009, p. 2).
We agree with Morris when he says that instructional design should “give platforms for those voices most usually suppressed or oppressed” (2018, para.7). Part of this work involves repatriating indigenous artifacts from their various colonial holdings around the world (NBC, 2021). Elders can develop rich DLEs to teach the artifacts’ history in context, as is being done in the Inuvialuit Pitqusiit Inuuniarutait (Inuvialuit Living History) project (CBC, 2020). Combined with Indigenous Digital Storytelling as described by Iseke & Moore “to teach youth their cultural traditions and the Western skills that will enable them to work in the wider world” (2011, p. 21), an alternative to the currently practiced Eurocentric model of written word and culturally appropriated teaching can be developed that is authentic, decolonized, and comes directly from the people who own it, rather than filtered through a western academic lens.
Radical ways to meet user’s needs to work on Acceptance and Academy for Oral Traditions
Conclusion
This design thinking challenge was a good opportunity to stretch our thoughts on possibilities to close the education gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous learners and how that can happen. We were able to use the process to dig deep into what learners need to successfully participate in DLEs and build solutions to close the gap. We feel that reliable access, story mining and preservation, and radical acceptance of oral traditions are possible solutions for Indigenous learners who are survivors and as Wilson-Fontain put it, “thrivers” (Monkman, 2019).
References
Anthony, S. G., & Keating, M. S. (2013). The difficulties of online learning for Indigenous Australian students living in remote communities–it’s an issue of access. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(2).
Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Stuff The British Stole. (n.d.). [Collection]. Retrieved January 1, 2022, from https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/stuff-the-british-stole/
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. (2020, August 10). “All his wisdom will be missed”: Lifelong Inuvialuit advocate dies at 71. CBC News. CBC. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/randal-boogie-pokiak-inuvialuit-obituary-1.5680097
Code, Allan. (2020). Pandemic – at the end of the world. [National Film Board of Canada]. https://www.nfb.ca/film/pandemic-at-the-end-of-the-world/
Goulet, L., Pelletier, J., Pete, S., Racette, C., Longman, S. Goodwill, K., & Fayant, R. (2009). Asokan (The Bridge) Teachers’ Work with Elders. Saskatoon: Dr. Stirling MacDowell Foundation for Research Into Teaching Inc., Project #188.
Hotte, N., Nelson, H., Hawkins, T., Wyatt, S., & Kozak, R. (2018). Maintaining accountability between levels of governance in Indigenous economic development: Examples from British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 61(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12287
Howe, E. C. (2011). Mishchet aen kishkayhtamihk nawut ki wiichiihtonaan: Bridging the aboriginal education gap in Saskatchewan. Gabriel Dumont Institute.
Indigenous Services Canada, Government of Canada. (2020). Annual Report to Parliament 2020. https://www.sac-isc.gc.ca/eng/1602010609492/1602010631711
Innovation, Science and Economic Development, Government of Canada (2019). High Speed Internet Access for All: Canada’s Connectivity Strategy. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/139.nsf/eng/h_00002.html
Inuvialuit Cultural Resource Center and University of Alberta. (2014). Inuvialuit Digital Library. https://inuvialuitdigitallibrary.ca/collections
Iseke, J., & Moore, S. (2011). Community-based Indigenous Digital Storytelling with Elders and Youth. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 35(4), 19–38.
McIntosh, Emma (2020). What it means when we say Indigenous land is ‘unceded’. Jan 24, 2020 Podcast. Canada’s National Observer. https://www.nationalobserver.com/2020/01/24/analysis/what-we-mean-when-we-say-indigenous-land-unceded
Monkman, Leonard. (2019). From survivors to ‘thrivers’: former residential school students connect with culture and each other. CBC News. Retrieved January 1, 2022 from https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/residential-school-survivors-thrivers-1.5296107
Morris, S. M. (2018). Critical Instructional Design. In An Urgency of Teachers. Pressbooks.
Europe returns looted African treasures as it reckons with colonial past. (n.d.). NBC News. Retrieved January 1, 2022, from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/europe-returns-looted-benin-bronzes-africa-reckons-legacy-empire-rcna3986
Native Land. (2020). Native Land Digital. WordPress. https://native-land.ca/
SUNTEP (Saskatoon, Sask.), & Gabriel Dumont Institute of Native Studies and Applied Research (Eds.). (2013). “Be bold! Move forward!”: Measuring success. Gabriel Dumont Institute.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015). Truth and Reconciliation of Canada: Calls to Action. https://ehprnh2mwo3.exactdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Calls_to_Action_English2.pdf

As an Inuvialuk, my lens on the work I do, lessons I develop, and authenticity I like to provide, I would recommend ADDIE to be redefined as below:
A = Audience: Developing a learning program should be developed with the audience in mind. What I create as an educator or guide is dependent on the age, geographic region, and economic intents. For example, what I develop to train individuals in the oil industry will be different than what I develop for those who are protecting our land, resources, and environment. Audience will help me decide what sensitivities to be mindful of and criteria to establish.
D = Design: I agree that design is the next phase and an important tool to determine next steps. Design should offer visual engagement while achieving the learning objectives set forth using the best tool with time and resources available.
I = Indigenize: Replacing Implement with Indigenize is of personal importance that is part of all of my work. This offers a lens from the perspective of an Indigenous person, at every opportunity possible towards reconciliation. If the trainer/developer is non-Indigenous, find opportunity to invite and collaborate with Indigenous teachers in a mindful and respectful way.
D = Development: This phase allows the three previous steps to be combined to develop the learning course. This is a critical phase and takes a larger portion of time than the previous as by trial-and-error glitches will be corrected and the design program of choice has a critical role
E = Engage: Replacing Evaluation with engage is important as the entire intent for the training is to engage our audience. Engagement is very important in any learning program. Those that can engage, will have a deeper understanding and an interest to dig deeper. If we focus on engaging our audience versus evaluating the responses, our time will be better spent on developing valuable material as evaluations tend to take a tremendous amount of time. How well an audience engages is the evaluation.
References:
Government of Canada. (2021). Indigenous Peoples and Lands. [Digital Map]. https://native-land.ca/
Water Bear Learning. (2020). What is the ADDIE Model of Instructional Design? [Blog]. https://waterbearlearning.com/addie-model-instructional-design/
In consideration of the existing design models to guide the design of learning environments, which I eagerly look forward to, the following are my thoughts to questions asked:
Some things to consider, in my area of work, which includes education and cultural awareness are:
When I make design decisions, I have a few things I consider as well as the role the design models and innovation play in this process described below:
Design models I found useful when making design decisions include: