Tag: instructional design

Assignment 1 Part A – Design Thinking

Problem Statement:

Bobbi and Krista are discovering methods for students to better engage with curriculum while developing real-life skills and enhancing cultural perspective. Important to both learning groups is an increased cognizance of what is beyond their educational confines: considering the needs of 21st-century learners in an international high school; and supporting 20-30-year-old (mostly) Caucasian males, respectively. While there is an obvious contrast between groups’ participant diversity (or lack thereof), they are comparable in that both groups lack perspective outside their immediate context.

For us, one of the defining factors is trust and perspective. To encourage participation, we created an environment that is both comfortable and safe, while allowing for vulnerability (Wegerif, 1998). Although both groups have different needs, they require skills to engage online through collaboration, communication, and knowledge-building. Krista’s learning group is needing the support of the community to build awareness for operational work; Bobbi’s students are growing their international-mindedness. Both groups require the cognitive skills of a 21st-century learner/thinker to support their future endeavors.

Building Empathy:

Through the design process, we discovered current, common needs. Krista was seeking methods to build camaraderie online and encourage engagement, while Bobbi is seeking meaningful engagement through understanding. Because of concern for learner complacency (those who do the minimum needed to pass versus those who construct knowledge), it is essential to create learning experiences that are both authentic and experiential in nature (Crichton & Carter, 2017). In wanting to build online skills in research, collaboration, and communication, it was highlighted that both groups of students had to build a greater understanding of themselves and the world – a difficult concept to teach.

Our Solution:

Papert’s theory of constructivism offers that “[constructing] knowledge and understanding are through the building of something that is shareable outside of the student’s head” (Crichton & Carter, 2017, p.16). To aid in developing new perspectives and engagement, we created an activity that is low-risk and inclusive. In this activity, students represent self-selected United Nation countries in a simulated UN conference. The activity plays out live via Blackboard Collaborate or Skype and is centered around their countries’ positions on the urban refugee crisis.

Prior to this culminating activity, students will connect with other UN countries. Sharing details of the countries represented (such as policies, cultural perspectives, and/or resources), students will determine if other countries geographically and politically support their position. By connecting synchronously online, students will evaluate each countries’ perspective. To model participation, the instructor will also represent a country, engaging in the same process. Final positions are compared with initial positions and posted to a forum.

This activity offers students the opportunity to engage in discussions concerning a global crisis that continues to have an impact on the world. As Burkhardt et al. (2003) confirm: interpersonal, management and problem-solving skills are fundamental to this economy, and students must demonstrate flexibility in an ever-changing environment that necessitates critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication/collaboration skills to adapt to any given situation.

Analysis:

The limitations of the logistics of this activity include: (1) that it is a new activity and some glitches may occur, and (2) keeping track of participant engagement might be difficult.

The limitations of the learner experience include: (1) the topic of the refugee crisis might not be of interest to all participants, thus limiting intrinsic motivation; (2) lack of background knowledge of the present day refugee context could hinder engagement; and (3) technology skill levels of the participants might detract from interaction and engagement.

 

References

Burkhardt, G., Monsour, M., Valdez, G., Gunn, G., Dawson, M., Lemke, C., Coughlin, E., Thadani, V., & Martin, C. (2003). Literacy in the digital age. NCREL. Retrieved from http://pict.sdsu.edu/engauge21st.pdf

Crichton, S. & Carter, D. (2017). Taking Making into Classrooms Toolkit. Open School/ITA.

Wegerif, R. (1998). The social dimension of asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(1), 34–49. doi: https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/sites/default/files/v2n1_wegerif_1.pdf.

Activity 6: Navigating Abundance

Taken by Karen Maeers in Hanoi, Vietnam

What We Investigated

With a limit of sixty minutes each to research our chosen topic of increasing traffic to blog sites, Karen and I both witnessed an abundance of content (Weller, 2011), including news articles, videos, infographics, social media groups, books and services for purchase. Topics ranged from those targeted to a novice audience, to others which cataloged and tracked successful blogs and topic influencers. We also found many active newsfeeds and digital environments with participants interested in what seemed to be an endless number of topics.

What We Found and Confidence in Abundance

In an initial search of “drive traffic to blog” resulting findings matched close to fifty million sources, which was overwhelming, even through the lens of this activity. Further refinement of search variables to include only those resources associated with 2017 resulted in over nine million results. We were confident that we had abundant content, but whether it was reliable and valid would take many more hours to determine.

The information provided listed strategies to increase the number of blog visitors. Sources uncovered were targeted to varying user abilities, meaning that a novice personal blogger with lower technology skills could navigate and apply the suggestions provided by some sources. Additionally, more advanced methods and strategies were presented for those with established social media presence, developed navigation skills, and fulsome content knowledge. Dependent on the situation and context, learners have control to choose which strategies are most applicable and to decide how and when to apply them, discriminating the value of the research, and then constructing knowledge.

Navigating the Abundance Uncovered

It is clear that information is more dynamic and accessible in the 21st-century, and that there are skills needed to navigate the abundance of information available. As learners in this vast arena of abundant online content, we reflected upon which search terms and other refinements would uncover relevant and current information. As we dug down with refinements to search criteria, we were able to target our search, but remained overwhelmed with the results and began to question the credibility or value of the sources provided.

Having the ability to access information quickly and effectively is a required transferable skill (Weller, 2011) that supports “learners in a journey to capacity rather than competency” (Anderson, 2016, p. 42). The shift from a supply-push model to a demand-pull model results in learner time and attention being scarce, as opposed to content scarcity (Weller, 2011). To be able to evaluate the abundance of information, the value of possessing critical thinking skills is crucial to determine the relevance of the text and to effectively analyze the content.

Supporting Learners

As an instructor, there are some simple ways to make sense of the content for learning.  Instructional designers must prioritize learner support in understanding how to take advantage of the wealth of knowledge available so they can effectively evaluate uncovered content and learn how to find ways to manage it (Weller, 2011).

When learners engage with online digital learning environments, they produce content and discover “how to effectively participate in conversations,” which “is as important as learning the subject matter material itself” (Weller, 2011, p. 6). The wealth of information allows that both learners and instructors can add to, review and edit existing content, thereby adding new perspectives which can “enhance the work of others through added insights and findings” (Anderson, 2016, p. 40). Since knowledge today is more readily accessible to learners in digital formats, knowledge scarcity disappears and learners are no longer bound by accessing knowledge in a repository such as a library (Weller, 2011).

Today, content is distributed for free on a global scale (Weller, 2011), allowing novices and experts to connect effectively online. Learners can self-organize to share knowledge, resources, and questions, thereby organizing a support network (Anderson, 2016), with instructors acting as a source of support for learners, in framing knowledge and encouraging collaboration (Weller, 2011). When learners are supported to monitor, evaluate, and update their constructions based on new knowledge or perspectives presented from other digital participants (Ertmer & Newby, 2013), a partnership evolves between novice and experienced contributors. As described by Anderson (2016), when learners are actively engaged and when they participate in conversations with multiple people with varied perspectives, learning is supported. From Ertmer and Newby (2013), because learners create meaning based on their individual experiences and validate them through negotiation when the instructor encourages communication in online environments, learners can communicate and collaborate with others to construct learning which is authentic and which holds meaning for them (Anderson, 2016).

Conclusion

We often reflect on the great thinkers of the past, working in veritable isolation. If the web was available to the great thinkers in the past to explore, collaborate, and share discoveries, who knows what the world would look like? When determining how to increase traffic to a blog site, the extensive information uncovered was overwhelming. The need to determine and discern the relevance of information and tips was evident because the diversity in the information puts the learner in control, choosing what is applicable to their given situation. In gaining perspective of scenarios, there is an increase in the importance of collaboration and a focus on users contributing to each other’s understanding (Weller, 2011). The growth from Web 1.0 to 2.0, brings new social media and other technology tools, emphasizing participation and encouraging focused conversations (Weller, 2011). When learning online, we determined that technology literacy skills are important and that the ability to connect and collaborate within an online environment is also a key factor to effective content knowledge navigation.

 

References

Anderson, T. (2016). Chapter 3: Theories for Learning with Emerging Technologies. In Veletsianos, G. (Ed). Emergence and Innovation in Digital Learning: Foundations and Applications. Edmonton, AB: Athabasca University Press.

Ertmer, P., & Newby, T. (2013). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71.

Weller, M. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance. Spanish Journal of Pedagogy, 249, 223–236.