Which framework(s) will provide the backbone?

 

In the first Padlet exercise of LRNT 622 I listed a few overarching goals, one of which described that findings should be applicable to an adult learner group, making Adult Learning Theory seemingly a good fit. Ruey (2010) explores how using Knowles’ contract learning concept can help learners plan experiences based on their needs, prior experiences, goals, interests and self-concept. Doing so can increase learner self-awareness around their preferred learning style, which can help the learner assume more responsibility for their own learning. Since the model I hope to evaluate would include on-demand learning, this theoretical framework should help to provide a backbone of known information off of which my research will build.

The second framework that seems like it may be valuable to bound the research is Engagement Theory, which also focuses on experiential and self-directed learning (Kearsley & Shneiderman, 1993). Bonk and Khoo (2014) suggest that learner engagement is manifested through behaviour, and that “when it comes to achievement, involvement in the learning process matters” (p. 209).

A couple of questions popped up for me to consider:

  1. I wonder if the fact that the professional development I am exploring is mandatory and tied directly to the learners’ ability to sustain their professional designation will have an impact?
  2. I wonder how or if a learner’s ability and comfort level with using technology will factor in when evaluating strategies for online professional development?

References

Bonk, C. J., & Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100+ activities for motivating and retaining learners online (pp. 1-368). OpenWorldBooks.com and Amazon CreateSpace.

Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational technology38(5), 20-23.

Ruey, S. (2010). A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online lea rning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(5), 706-720. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00965.xv