Links between learning and technology throughout history.

The relationship between technology and learning goes back 2,500 years, (Bates, 2014) from the use of rudimentary tools and paints by earth’s earliest inhabitants, to the expanse of digital platforms and technology tools available today. The concept that recurred for me as I researched the history of technology in the education field was a simple one: the effective transfer of knowledge requires mutually accessible and adopted communication tools.

The introduction of the printing press in the 15th century allowed increased access to written knowledge, thereby backing-up standard oral communication practices (Bates, 2014). Advances to transportation infrastructure in the 19th century further facilitated information sharing through improved channels such as the postal system. As new technologies including radio in the 1920s and television in the 1960s emerged, so did new opportunities for education. However, just as the lack of transportation infrastructure limited the exchange of knowledge before the 19th century, many challenges restricted pervasive uptake of radio and television as education tools, including the lack of available electricity, high costs and local language and cultural issues (Bates, 2014).

World War II significantly impacted uptake in use of technology in education through the development of audiovisual devices, widely used by governmental agencies to train troops both during the war and later in the workplace (Reiser, 2001). The launch of the World Wide Web in 1991 and improvements to user experience provided by search engines such as Google in 1999, further shifted the adoption of technology, both in education and in daily life (Bates, 2014).

In reflecting on this research, the posts of fellow cohort members and my own experiences using technology for learning, I grow to appreciate that technology-based learning environments are not effective on their own. As the field continues to grow, learners must be supported to adopt technological advances in relation to their abilities, communication styles and perspectives around technological learning environments (Lowyck, 2014). Instructional designers must also continually consider and incorporate evolutions in learning theory, with the goal of supporting learners to success.

References
Bates, T. (2014). A short history of educational technology. In Online learning and distance education Resources. Retrieved from https://www.tonybates.ca/2014/12/10/a-short-history-of-educational-technology/

Lowyck, J. (2014). Bridging learning theories and technology-enhanced environments: A critical appraisal of its history. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 3-20). Springer New York. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_1

Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: a history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504506

3 thoughts on “Links between learning and technology throughout history.”

  1. Hey Karen,
    Great post, love the toolbelt pic (only next time maybe a carpenters belt, not a plumbers belt…but I’ll let that go :-)).
    Good call that learners need to be supported in any tech learning environment (or any environment tech or not), it feels like this is sometimes forgotten in an online or blended situation.
    Steve

    1. Hi Steve.

      Thanks for your comment. During this exercise I kept thinking back to the debate we did in LRNT 521. It’s not just a question of access, is it? I was thinking of the White and Le Cornu article we read as well. Did you find any red-threads running through in the readings of this course so far?

      Enjoy the day, Karen.

      PS: Glad you like the photo – we are just about done with the restoration from the flood we had earlier this year and I couldn’t help but take a snap of this toolbelt as it will soon migrate back to the garage.

  2. Karen and Steve:

    Thanks for bringing up the issues of support and access! One of the claims in the field – also seen throughout the history of distance education – is that various initiatives/technologies will broaden access to and participation in education. One of the connections to 521 is the work of Jenkins on participatory cultures. In what ways would Jenkins argue that technologies may not necessarily bring about democratization of education?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share This