Unit 3 Activity 2 Leading Projects

We were asked by another organisation for assistance with the training component for an innovative pilot project they were spearheading.  The goal of the pilot project was to have people with no dental background be trained to deliver a non-restrictive service to children. The organisation was looking at a new way of providing a service to those in high need yet restricted by access and other barriers.  We liked the outside of the box thinking and how the organisation was re-framing this issue as a creative opportunity (Conway et al., 2017, p. 6).  Many of the initial meetings with the organisation were information gathering sessions which led to the development of the goals and objectives of the project.  It was at this point that the organisation recognised that this was a much larger project than they had anticipated and decided to consult with a project manager for support.  Unfortunately, this project did not complete as planned for a variety of reasons.

In retrospect, this project was faced with many challenges which I believe could have been avoided if a project manager had been tasked with leading this project. One of the biggest challenges was lack of leadership to drive the project forward.  As Watt (2014) states, “leadership is the ability to motivate and inspire individuals to work toward expected results” (p. 21) and although a project manager was later brought on to help create the plan, the project manager was far too busy with other projects to commit to this project.  So, ultimately there was no one who was willing to lead this innovative project to completion which led to the stakeholders not receiving the benefits they were supposed to.  

Many of the details surrounding the project were also a challenge because they were not defined.  For example, determining the policy around forms and documentation of the delivery of services, selecting the criteria for sites to be part of the project, selecting the training format (in person or online) and deciding what data to collect to evaluate the success of the program.  Also, the organisation was working with a five month timeline to implement the project, which also posed a challenge, as it did not leave much time for planning while ensuring realistic timelines were set for the completion of activities.  Watt (2014) states “project management is a process that includes planning, putting the project plan into action, and measuring progress and performance” (p. 14).  Although this was an innovated project, many of the elements needed for the successful completion of a project were lacking as the organisation had not fully understood the scope of the project.

Lastly, I realised that the organisation lacked the understanding about the implementation of this type of program because they did not have a subject matter expert to answer their questions.  I believe that this project required not only project management but also needed to infuse some design thinking into the process because of the proposed new way to deliver the service.  Ben Mahmoud-Jouini et al. (2016) state that design thinking can contribute to managing challenges encountered in project management in terms of the exploration (p. 152).  If the organisation had not had such a tight timeline, more time could have been taken for exploration to answer questions around the details/processes and to come up with possible solutions for this innovative project.  For example, through the design thinking process the organisation would have been able to come up with possible solutions for the documentation of services, referrals process and gathering of data.  

In closing, I see the value of project management as I have seen many projects go sideways for various reasons but acknowledge that it may not be suited in all contexts, specifically those with uncertainty and complexity.  There is value to having aspects of design thinking integrated into the process especially in healthcare when looking at innovative ways to deliver care.  “Design thinking is a problem ‘defining and solving’ approach that deals with ill-structured situations where the problem is not articulated and is considered a hypothesis…” (Ben Mahmoud-Jouini et al., 2016, p. 150).

References

Ben Mahmoud‐Jouini, S., Midler, C., & Silberzahn, P. (2016). Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context. Project management journal, 47(2), 144-156.

Conway, R., Masters, J., & Thorold, J. (2017). From design thinking to systems change. How to invest in innovation for social impact. RSA Action and Research Centre.

Watt, A. (2014). Project Management. Victoria, BC: BCcampus.

Activity 3: Leadership Reflections

Photo by Anna Tarazevich from Pexels

In an ever changing world, leaders have to be quick to adapt to changing landscapes especially in digital learning environments (DLEs) which are dynamic and often involve multiple stakeholders at various levels.  For this reason, I believe in order for a leader to be successful working in a DLE, they require these three attributes:  inspiring, strategic or forward-looking and possess effective communication skills.  Intertwining these three skills will allow the leader to mobilize their stakeholders and/or followers, plan and make decisions accordingly and build capacity.

Inspiring has always been at the top of my list of attributes of leadership which is consistent with the findings from Kouzes & Posner’s (2011) research; inspiring consistently ranked among the top 4 attributes over the years and globally (p. 5).  Reflecting on my experience of working for an organization where transformational change was the driving force in achieving the organization’s vision gave me insight into how valuable this leadership attribute is at motivating workers and ensuring that everyone’s work aligns with the organization’s values.  Leaders were passionate when presenting the Gantt charts and action plans to staff and stakeholders while providing regular updates on our progress and timelines in achieving the goal. Their optimistic, positive energy made it easy to aspire to the work.  I believe that working in a DLE, a leader would need to be able to convey their passion and commitment to the work and vision.  

The LEADS framework is a leadership capabilities framework which guides much of my work and under the Systems Transformation heading of this framework, it states “leaders demonstrate systems/critical thinking and orient themselves strategically to the future” (Canadian College of Health Leaders, 2021).  For this reason, I believe leaders working in a DLE need to be strategic planners or forward-looking with the ability to see the “big picture”.  They need to be prepared for anything and everything that comes their way while providing the necessary support, resources and tools their followers may require to continue to align their work with the vision.  Effective leaders require the ability to predict potential conflicts or challenges which may affect the vision.  It is this ability to look ahead which allows them to be prepared to address challenges or conflicts by formulating possible solutions to address them.  In addition, because they are able to see the whole picture and communicate effectively with the various stakeholders, they can make a well-informed decision in which all the stakeholders’ cases have been taken into consideration; no crucial information is missing.  This attribute is essential for a leader working in a dynamic environment in order to be able to deliver results.

Lastly, Sheninger (2019), lists communication as one of the seven pillars of digital leaders in education and states, “digital leadership is about engaging all stakeholders in two-way communication” (p. 2).  A leader needs to be an effective communicator to engage stakeholders so that there will be “buy in” with the vision by gaining a better understanding of how it benefits them. This attribute is also highlighted by the LEADS framework (2021) and includes the leader’s ability to listen well while creating an environment where there is an open exchange of information and ideas. This in turn leads to team building where there is collaboration and cooperation towards achieving the desired results.  As stated above, good effective communication ensures that all factors are considered before a leader makes a decision.  For these reasons, I believe that communication is a necessary attribute for a leader working in a DLE to build the necessary relationships.

In closing, the following three attributes: inspiring, forward-thinking and an effective communicator are necessary for a leader working in a DLE to possess in order to achieve success in a dynamic environment with multiple stakeholders at various levels.  

References

Canadian College of Health Leaders. (n.d.). LEADS Framework. https://www.leadscanada.net/site/about/about-us/framework?nav=sidebar

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2011). Credibility: How leaders gain and lose it, why people demand it (Vol. 203). John Wiley & Sons.

Sheninger, E. (2014). Pillars of digital leadership. International Center for Leadership in Education, 1(4).

Design Principles Manifesto

As I was preparing to create my design principles, I made the conscious decision to ensure they closely aligned with my dental hygiene practice philosophy. My dental hygiene practice philosophy consists of core personal values and a code of ethics which has only been strengthened over time and practice. After taking some time to reflect over the past nine weeks, I created six design principles to guide my design and innovation process which not only intertwines with my practice philosophy but also has broadened the scope of my practice philosophy.

References

Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2018). Beyond teaching instructional design models: exploring the  design process to advance professional development and expertise. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(1), 176-186.

Canadian Dental Hygienists Association. (2012). Dental hygienists’ code of ethics. https://www.cdha.ca/pdfs/Profession/Resources/Code_of_Ethics_EN_web.pdf

Morris, S. M. (2018). Critical Instructional Design. In An Urgency of Teachers. Pressbooks. https://criticaldigitalpedagogy.pressbooks.com/chapter/critical-pedagogy-and-learning-online/

Stefaniak, J. E. (2021). Documenting Instructional Design Decisions. Design for Learning.

Proposed Design Solution / by Cook and Yee

As part of our design thinking process, we defined our problem statement as:  Gail needs a way to support Indigenous families in learning about good oral health because of the health risks to children and to help build capacity in communities.

We selected the idea of an oral health story contest as our solution to build, as for us, this solution holds the most potential to align with a critical instructional approach whereby users (children) are encouraged to co-create instructional content by partnering with other students, and by using various modes of representation, understandings, and languages as aligned with Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles (CAST, 2021; Rogers-Shaw et al., 2018). As Morris (2018) argued, critical instruction design “aims for the fullest inclusion possible” (para. 24).

As parents, we have experienced how our own children love to have agency over their own learning and often enjoy instructing others. We imagined a multidisciplinary approach, whereby the stories shared, and lessons learned might be a collaborative arts-based process, for example, by partnering dental hygiene students with students and schoolteachers in science, music, or language classes.

Partnering with schools also hopefully addresses possible barriers to connectivity, with reliable Wi-Fi and computers on site. We also envisioned gathering oral health stories in an open platform (with consultation), to be shared with other health care professionals, parents, caregivers, and children, and other community stakeholders can help to increase capacity, and with an upstream wellness approach.  

We created the following infographic using Piktochart to illustrate our prototype and look forward to questions and feedback for further iterations.

References

CAST (2021). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org 

Morris, S. M. (2018). Critical Instructional Design. In An Urgency of Teachers. Pressbooks. https://criticaldigitalpedagogy.pressbooks.com/chapter/critical-pedagogy-and-learning-online/ 

Rogers-Shaw, C., Carr-Chellman, D. J., & Choi, J. (2018). Universal design for learning: Guidelines for accessible online instruction. Adult learning, 29(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1045159517735530 

Activity 1: Tools, Roles and Superpowers

As a Dental Hygiene Practitioner, I wear multiple hats and continue to undertake things which my dental hygiene education program never prepared me for. I have created this infographic to illustrate a couple of my superpowers.

At the top is an ear to illustrate that any point of contact with any client or program stakeholder is entered with cultural safety and humility meaning that I listen respectfully without judgement. My role in public health is not only about addressing issues in the mouth but also addressing other issues clients may face which impacts their oral health; money and access being the biggest barriers. From there, I take all the information gathered to create a plan which addresses the client’s or stakeholders’ concerns which encompasses critical thinking and decision making as I do not believe in a one size fits all approach. Lastly, I ensure discussion and agreement with clients and stakeholders.

In addition to creating a safe space, three of my superpowers are problem-solver, collaborator and health promoter. The pandemic has forced public health dental programs to harness technology in creative and innovative ways in order to pivot face-to-face points of contact for oral health conversations. Using technology for Zoom video calls for 1:1s or group oral health sessions, webinars for potential stakeholders to better understand the importance of oral health for overall health and proposing collaboration opportunities for stakeholders. Using social media to connect with FaceBook storytime video sessions, posting videos from dental professionals about the importance of tooth brushing, and posting photos of children brushing their teeth to participate in a tooth brushing contest.

Recently, I have been able to utilize the in house mobile video interpreter to communicate with clients in their native language while educating them about the importance of oral health. In other cases, when technology is not available or accessible, I have added printed oral health resources into oral health care packages which are distributed within communities. In my day-to-day work, I am often problem solving by asking questions, leveraging my relationships and raising the oral health profile in search for possible solutions.

Morgan (2019) describes the role of instructional designers as complex with some seeing the role of Instructional Designers as change agents (Campbell et al., 2009 as cited in Morgan 2019). This point resonated with me as dental hygienists are change agents who advocate for marginalized groups while challenging and pushing boundaries; they are not solely “gum gardeners” or “teeth cleaners”. My work allows me to harness these superpowers with the reward of seeing a child’s happy, healthy smile.

References

First Nations Health Authority. (n.d.) Cultural safety and humility.
https://www.fnha.ca/wellness/wellness-and-the-first-nations-health-authority/cultural-safety-and-humility

Morgan, T. (2019). Instructional Designers and Open Education Practices: Negotiating the Gap between Intentional and Operational Agency. Open Praxis, 11(4), 369-380.

 

Selecting Design Models

There are many factors to take into consideration when selecting a design model.  I have chosen to highlight the following 3 factors:

      1. Instructional Designers personal opinions
      2. Learning Objectives and outcomes
      3. Learners’ needs 

“Technology is created with the developers’ world views, values, beliefs, and assumptions embedded into its design.  These worldviews are revealed through the activities supported and encouraged by the technology” (Veletsianos, 2016, p. 253).  Past experiences of learning designers has the potential to form biases and preferential tendencies of certain design models.  Some instructional designers may continue to utilise a particular design model because of comfort level or avoid others because of negative past experiences.  By doing so, they may not be selecting the most suitable design model to address the needs of the instructional design project. According to Dousay (2018), “…popularity serves as a form of validation for these design models, but a wise instructional designer knows when to use, adapt, or create a new model of instructional design to fit their purposes” (para. 10).  

Learning objectives, goals and outcomes should be taken into consideration when selecting a design model.  One of the most recognised and utilised design models is ADDIE.  Bates (2015), attributes the success of ADDIE to “…good quality design, with clear learning objectives, carefully structured content,…and assessment strongly tied to desired learning outcomes” (para. 11).  Within the Analyse and Design phases of the ADDIE model, the learning objectives, goals and outcomes are identified and addressed, then incorporated into the Develop phase.  For anyone entering the field of instructional design, ADDIE’s linear and step by step method will ensure the desired end outcomes or the results and feedback from the Evaluation phase will feed into the next iteration of the project.

Learners’ needs and preferences will influence which design model to use.  In a quickly changing world, learners’ need to quickly adapt and learn the necessary skills or information for school or for work.  Bates (2015) points out that the agile design model has the capability to help students develop the necessary specific skills needed in the digital age while maintaining a focus on preparing students for the rapidly changing world.  Whereas the ADDIE model known for working best with large and complex projects may not be able to adapt as quickly to learners’ needs.  Therefore some design models may be better able to accommodate learners’ needs.  

At this time, I have not had experience with making these design model decisions.  However, upon learning more design models and the variety that exists, I may want to gravitate towards the industry standard and use the ADDIE model while keeping in mind its limitations. 

References:

Bates, T. (2015). Chapter 4.3 The ADDIE Model and Chapter 4.7 ‘Agile’ Design: flexible designs for learning. In Teaching in the digital age. BCcampus. 

Dousay. T. A. (2017). Chapter 22. Instructional Design Models. In R. West (Ed.), Foundations of Learning and Instructional Design Technology (1st ed.).

Veletsianos, G. (2016). Digital learning environments. In N. Rushby & D. Surry (Eds), Handbook of Learning Technologies (pp. 242-260). UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Assignment 3: Learning Analytics and Dental Education in 2030

The COVID-19 pandemic forced dental education programs which had traditionally only ever been taught via face-to-face to pivot quickly to online instruction in order to complete the 20/21 school year.  With this sudden shift to online learning, institutions re-evaluated the previously held notion that dental programs could never be taught online because students needed face-to-face instruction to develop the necessary competent clinical skills and communication skills to have close personal interactions with their patients.  

In 2030, blended or hybrid dental programs have become the norm allowing dental students increased flexibility to do a portion of their studies online.  However, moving to this model required learning institutions to rely on the steady, reliable nature of the Learning Management System (LMS) as described by Weller (2020) which led to the increased usage of learning analytics to inform decision making.  With learning analytics, Pelletier et al., (2021) explain that institutions were able to harness the data to respond to student needs early by identifying those who exhibited low engagement or did not perform well on early assessments.  By doing so, institutions were able to ensure that there was little to no attrition within cohorts. With the gathering of all this student data, issues arose of whether it was legal, ethical or both.  Zijlstra-Shaw & Stokes (2018) state, “the issue of what is essential data for tracking learner performance and what is data captured because it is available and might be useful in the future presents an issue for the ethical and informed use of student data” (p. 659).  By 2030, institutions had worked through some of the challenges faced early on with the push to blended or hybrid dental programs.

Although learning analytics has proven to be advantageous for the various stakeholders; ethical issues around transparency, data ownership and data interpretation had to be addressed when dental programs switched to a hybrid model.  Initially, there was little transparency and lack of understanding regarding data collection from stakeholders.  Pardo & Siemens (2014) argued that stakeholders should understand how the analytics process is carried out and stakeholders, specifically students should be informed of the type of information that is being collected; including how it is collected, stored, and processed.  By 2030, dental institutions had created and implemented the necessary policies, protocols and procedures which raised student awareness about data collection so that students were in a better position to give their informed consent to data collection.  With the increase in transparency along with better understanding, students were able to embrace and justify the use of learning analytics to their advantage by achieving their individual learning goals which in turn led to an increase in student retention in dental programs.  In addition, Prinsloo & Slade found that (as cited in Zijlstra-Shaw & Stokes, 2018, e659) student trust and cooperation could be gained when there was an increase in the transparency of learning analytic activities. 

Another challenge with learning analytics which needed to be addressed was the issue around ownership of the data. Pardo & Siemens (2014) proposed the student open model where transparency was increased because students were able to access and correct the data obtained about them.  Prinsloo & Slade (2013) stressed the importance that institutions should not be the sole player with decision making power when it came to determining the scope, the definition and the use of educational data for learning analytics.  Input from other stakeholders was required to make decisions. At one point early on in the shift to hybrid model, institutions considered that datasets could be collected from different dental schools and then pooled together for a larger dataset which could potentially be used for comparison purposes between provinces or countries.  However, with the new policies in place and input from stakeholders, dental institutions ensured students had control of their data which included the ability to correct their data and institutions in turn would guarantee that students’ data were not going to be given out or shared with other institutions. By 2030, dental institutions needed to ensure that there were no 3rd party collectors of data involved in order to maintain the trust of their students.  

A further challenge of learning analytics which had to be addressed by institutions was the interpretation of the data and the potential for profiling. In their study, Howell et al. (2018) reported concerns from academics regarding the potential to collect data which did not accurately reflect students’ activities.  If that were the case, then how would dental instructors respond to the inaccurate interpretations which could potentially lead to the damage of a student’s self-esteem based on the inaccurate data.  As well, early on many students were under the misapprehension that when their data was collected it was anonymous.  However, as Holloway (2020) highlighted that advanced algorithms were easily able to pull personal and demographic information about individuals whose data had been collected from the vast abundance of data available.  Institutions implemented policies which addressed both of these by taking the approach that more educational data did not always mean better educational data.  In addition, institutions reassured students that these types of algorithms were not in use and that their identities would remain private and secure as part of their consent. 

Learning analytics has proven to be advantageous for students, facilitators and institutions involved in hybrid dental programs in 2030.  For students, they are able to track their own progress through the dental program and make improvements in their performance based on the interpretations and analysis of their data.  Instructors are made aware of those dental students who are having challenges in the program and can review certain dental concepts if the data interpretation shows that students did not understand the concepts.  Finally, institutions are able to ensure that there is little to no student attrition in the cohort and make changes to their programs to maintain student engagement.  In order to gain acceptance from stakeholders, policies and protocols had to be created to address the challenges around transparency, data ownership and false interpretation of the data.

References

Holloway, K. (2020). Big Data and learning analytics in higher education: Legal and ethical considerations. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 32(4), 276-285.

Howell, J. A., Roberts, L. D., Seaman, K., & Gibson, D. C. (2018). Are we on our way to becoming a “helicopter university”? Academics’ views on learning analytics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(1), 1-20.

Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438-450.

Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., Bozkurt, A., Crawford, S., Czerniewicz, L., Gibson, R., Linder, K., Mason, J., & Mondelli, V. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition.

Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2013, April). An evaluation of policy frameworks for addressing ethical considerations in learning analytics. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 240-244).

Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE review, 46(5), 30.

Weller, M. (2018). Twenty years of EdTech. Educause Review Online, 53(4), 34-48.

Zijlstra-Shaw, S., & Stokes, C. W. (2018). Learning analytics and dental education; choices and challenges. European journal of dental education: official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 22(3), e658-e660. 

Thoughts about the Future

The COVID-19 pandemic forced dental programs which had only ever been face to face to quickly move to online instruction in order to complete the 20/21 school year.  With this sudden shift to online learning, institutions re-evaluated the previously held notion that dental programs could never be taught online because students needed face to face instruction to develop competent clinical skills and the necessary communication skills to have close personal face to face interactions with their patients. 

In 2030, blended or hybrid dental programs have become the norm allowing dental students increased flexibility to do a portion of their studies from home.  However, moving to this model required learning institutions to rely on the steady, reliable nature of the LMS as described by Weller (2020) which led to an increased use of learning analytics.  With learning analytics, Pelletier et al., (2021) explain that institutions were able to harness the data to respond to student needs early by identifying those who exhibited low engagement or did not perform well on early assessments.  By doing so, institutions were able to ensure that there was little to no attrition within cohorts,  With the gathering of all this student data issues arose issues of whether it was legal, ethical or both.  Zijlstra-Shaw & Stokes (2018) state, “the issue of what is essential data for tracking learner performance and what is data captured because it is available and might be useful in the future presents an issue for the ethical and informed use of student data” (e659).  By 2030, institutions had worked through some of the challenges faced early on with the push to blended or hybrid dental programs.  

References

Pelletier, K., Brown, M., Brooks, D. C., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Arbino, N., Bozkurt, A., Crawford, S., Czerniewicz, L., Gibson, R., Linder, K., Mason, J., & Mondelli, V. (2021). 2021 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition.

Weller, M. (2020). 25 Years of Ed Tech. Athabasca University Press.

Zijlstra-Shaw, S., & Stokes, C. W. (2018). Learning analytics and dental education; choices and challenges. European journal of dental education: official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 22(3), e658-e660.

The Great Media Debate Continues…

By Gail and Luis

For this activity, we were tasked with investigating the Great Media Debate in the Ed Tech field where Clark and Kozma expressed opposing viewpoints.  Simply stated, Clark (1994) believes that media does not influence learning and compares media to a “vehicle” which delivers instruction whereas Kozma (1994) believes that new technologies offer opportunities to change things and how it has the potential to impact how teaching and learning occur.  We chose these 2 articles to demonstrate the relevance of the media debate by applying Clark & Kozma’s points of view to critique and question the articles’ claims.  

Quizlet teams up with TikTok for interactive learning.

In January 2021, it was announced that educators using TikTok for teaching would be able to reach their students in a new way by integrating Quizlet interactive flashcards directly into their short-form videos.  This integration would shift TikTok’s platform into the education world and support their Creative Learning Fund.  This fund aims to address the COVID-19 pandemic challenges to remote and hybrid learning by bringing educational programs created by educators and other subject matter experts to the platform.  

The director of growth at Quizlet, Phil Carter (2021) states, “this integration between TikTok and Quizlet is a unique opportunity to bring together the fastest-growing mobile entertainment platform, and the largest AI-powered learning platform to reach students where they are” (para. 3).  The presumption is that educators can enhance their TikTok videos with Quizlet’s links thereby allowing students to engage and learn in a more interactive way on the popular platform.  TikTok’s head of product, Sean Kim (2021) states, “the integration with Quizlet is an important step in our commitment to assist creators in the production of learning content, provide resources for learners and introduce emerging teachers to the TikTok platform” (para. 6).

Clark would argue that this new integration of video and flashcards would not influence student learning based on his initial claim that media are “mere vehicles that deliver instruction” and that TikTok combined with Quizlet are just a different delivery “vehicle”.  Sean Kim (2021) states the integration “can help build human connection, promote creating learning content and inspire enriching ideas” and although Clark would agree that there is strong evidence that different media attributes accomplish the same learning goal.  He would maintain that it is not the media that influences the learning and instead it is the method.  

Kozma’s position on this new media partnership would ask the question:  how does this integration affect learning?  He would dispute that technology is a “vehicle” and stress that this media partnership possesses certain characteristics which make it more suitable to achieve particular learning tasks (1994).  Kozma (1994) would argue that learning with media is a complementary process where the learner and the media (TikTok and Quizlet) interact to expand and refine the learner’s mental model of a particular phenomenon.   

Incorporating popular media into social studies learning.

Darcy White has over 20 years of experience teaching secondary social sciences and is currently a Social Studies Curriculum Developer in California. In this article, she describes how students spend a lot of their time in front of their phones and other devices. She also points out how easy it is nowadays for students to create and share content to a large audience. As a teacher, instead of competing with the multiple devices and trending technologies she decided to embrace the popular culture and incorporate it in her lectures. White believes that using a variety of media such as movies, TV sitcoms and TikTok videos among others can be an effective learning tool for students. White (2021) states,  “the trick is to give students the opportunity to relate to the topic” (para. 9).

Clark would be intrigued to learn how White has implemented the new media and technology to her lectures. However, he would still argue that White’s methods “do not influence student achievement” and that her use of media in her classes are simply a different way of delivering instruction and does not influence learning under any circumstances.  

In contrast, Kozma (1994) would argue that the use of various new media with their own distinct capabilities would complement those of the learners producing an improved learning experience. Kozma would concur with White in her use of various media for her lectures since he perceives learning as an “active, constructive, cognitive and social process”. Kozma would align with White’s beliefs arguing that by forging a relationship between media and learning, the process itself can also contribute to the creation of new methods of instruction delivery. 

References:

EdScoop Staff (2021, January 28). Quizlet teams up with TikTok for interactive learning. Higher Education.

Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21-29.

Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning: Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7-19.

White, D. (2021, Sept. 7). Incorporating popular media into social studies learning. SmartBrief. Industry news.

 

 

 

 

 

 

“There is nothing ever static, it is always growing or building or changing” — Amanda Coolidge

I had the pleasure of hearing Amanda Coolidge, Director of Open Education BCCampus, speak at the 2021 MALAT Virtual Symposium on Open Education: what it is; what it does and its amazing impact!  The idea of open education and open textbooks was a foreign concept to me at the time.  I recall thinking about how much I had paid for my university textbooks.  How some were hardly used and how they were now gathering dust on my bookshelf.  While listening to Amanda speak, I also thought about how amazing it would have been to customise some of these textbooks based on personal experiences.  

I have chosen Amanda Coolidge based on her significant contributions and advocacy work in the field of Open education and Open textbooks in British Columbia.  Highlights of her and her team’s work include:

    • 2012: BC Open Textbook Project.  Since its launch the project has
      • Saved students more than $14 million in textbook costs
      • Impacted 130,000+ students
      • Experienced growth of the Open textbook collection.  The collection includes books and guides for post secondary education
    • 2012:  BC Open Education Librarians
      • Creation of the first open education librarians community in BC to learn about open education practices through sharing knowledge and providing support for others
    • 2014: Faculty Fellow Program 
      • Instructors brought together to determine efficacy of open textbook use and to provide mentorship to those new to open textbooks
    • 2016: Start of project to bring OpenStax books into Pressbooks
      • These books which could be edited, adapted and customized to meet students’ needs
      • By the Fall of 2019, there were 33 OpenStax books available in Pressbooks
    • Current:  Indigenization Project
      • Co-create open education resources to support incorporation of Indigenous epistemologies into professional practice

It is clear how passionate Amanda is about creating an equitable environment which embraces inclusion, diversity and accessibility.  She emphasizes the importance of collaboration and stepping out of our silos in order for change to occur.  

“Our greatest resource is the relationships we build in our community through collaboration” –Amanda Coolidge

I have included the following links for more information about Amanda Coolidge and her work:  

Amanda Notes

Between the Chapters 25 Years of Ed Tech:  Open Textbooks

From Lost to Belonging by Amanda Coolidge – OpenEd 2019 Keynote

Open Education BCCampus

Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast Episode 299

References

BCcampus.  (2019, October 28).  From lost to belonging by Amanda Coolidge – OpenEd 2019 keynote.  BCcampus.  https://bccampus.ca/2019/10/28/from-lost-to-belonging-by-amanda-coolidge-opened-2019-keynote/

Pasquini, L. (Host). (2021, March 25). Between the chapters #20 opening up a textbook & more access to learning with @acoolidge. [Audio podcast episode]. 25 Years of Ed Tech: The Serialized Audio Version Bonus. https://25years.opened.ca/2021/03/28/between-the-chapters-open-textbooks/

Stachowiak, B. (Host). (2020, March 5). Growing up open (Episode 299) [Audio podcast episode].  In Teaching in Higher Ed.   https://teachinginhighered.com/podcast/growing-up-open/#transcript