I will admit that the request to tie in my initial views on technology and education to the assigned reading forced me to reflect on just how little I knew about the subject’s history. I was fortunate to grow up alongside technology, with my school years seeming to keep pace with it’s use in education so that the advancement appeared to sync with my understanding of it and ability to use it. Its eye opening to dig into exactly how much influence and advancement technology had in the field of education in those first 15 or so years which had seemed a natural progression at the time but now I understand was not without it’s concerns and ‘growing pains’.
While there was a large amount of new information within the reading, the chapter that stood out was regarding E-Learning. I rather naively thought that e-learning was welcomed with open arms by the majority in the academic community when reality was higher education was concerned private companies and commercialization would be detrimental to academics (Weller, 2020), driven largely by an assumption of superiority of face-to-face learning along with an assumption of lower quality online schools. It wasn’t so much that the initial identification of these beliefs in the reading was surprising; it was more so that this thought of degrees and academic achievement from in-person universities being inherently better is still one that lingers today. With the amount of research, studies, and knowledge we have regarding e-Learning and distance education I find it fascinating that many still cling to the idea the resulting education is ‘lesser -than’ when compared to the same degree obtained in person. Without having read beyond the first third of 25 Years of Ed Tech, I am curious to see if this belief if address in later chapters.
References
Weller, M. (2020). 25 years of ed tech. Athabasca University Press. 25 Years of Ed Tech – Martin Weller – Google Books
September 5, 2023 at 5:15 pm
Jessica, you raised some really interesting points. I agree with you about taking a step back and reflecting on how much I knew about education and technology.
With online learning and distance education being around longer than I thought, it also surprises me that people still believe it is lower quality compared to face-to-face education. I do not think one is superior to the other; they just offer different ways of learning.
Why do you think there is still so much debate surrounding the quality and legitimacy of online education?
September 10, 2023 at 9:29 pm
Hi Catherine, thanks for the question! My initial gut reaction is to assume that the reticence to accept online degrees to the same valuable as those received via the traditional in-person option is one of cynicism; those who obtained their degree “the hard way” feel threatened that more options and availability to the same degree online will somehow devalue their achievements. That said, I did spend some time reading articles that look into this subject since we know what happens when we assume! Check out these two articles – they may shed some light into why students may choose online degrees and how they are viewed by those hiring:
Students perspective: Students’ Characteristics and Motivation Orientations for Online
and Traditional Degree Programs
Hiring perspective: The Acceptability of Online Degrees Earned as a Credential for Obtaining Employment
Stewart, C., Bachman, C., & Johnson, R. (2010). Students’ characteristics and motivation orientations for online and traditional degree programs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 367-379.
Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. H. (2006). The acceptability of online degrees earned as a credential for obtaining employment. Communication Education, 55(1), 32-45.
September 7, 2023 at 5:51 pm
Great submission Jessica! One thing that stuck out to me in the post-chapter podcast on this topic was how much I’ve heard the same arguments and resistance to e-learning in 2020 as they describe in 1999 (Pasquini, 2020)! I’ve heard business leaders continue to describe digital learning as less valuable than face-to-face options, less flexible, and disappointing because it does not live up to the cost recovery or return on investments which software companies promise. If we’re still feeling this push-back more than 20 years after the events described in Chapter 6 I suspect we’ll see similar themes in later chapters of the book too.
References
Pasquini, L. (Host). (2020 November 2) Between the Chapters #6 e-learning like it’s 1999 with @blacktimelord (No.16) [Audio podcast episode]. In 25 Years of Ed Tech. Google Podcasts. https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy50cmFuc2lzdG9yLmZtLzI1LXllYXJzLW9mLWVkLXRlY2g/episode/ZTQ5MmU3MzMtZTI3MC00YzczLWI1NzQtMWQ0MDBiMTVmYzQz?sa=X&ved=0CAUQkfYCahcKEwjo-_6235mBAxUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAQ