This is a final facilitation plan created by a team consisting of Alistair Linds, Amanda Dunn, Jeff Clemens, and Joyce Wimmer. This is created for LRNT528 at Royal Roads University for the purpose of facilitating a module addressing conflict and controversy in an online course environment. Please leave any comments or suggestions you might have for improving or adding to this module that you feel could improve the learner experience.
This has been a working document so there have been a few changes and there will likely continue to be according to feedback and knowledge.
Module Breakdown
Through this module, you will understand elements of conflict and controversy in an online course. There will be a discussion of elements of controversy and where they come from. How to deal with and recognize potential controversial content.
There will also be an opportunity to learn about different conflict styles to understand how you personally interact with others and how you might be able to address those issues.
The online elements will be explored by having these conversations in an online environment.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Recognize and discuss controversy while exploring conflict and understanding strategies you and others might use to address it.
ASSESSMENT
Assignment 1: Padlet conflict discussion
Assignment 2: Padlet controversy discussion
Reflection survey
READINGS
- Readings and Resources
- Arseh Sevom. (n.d.). How-To Recognize and Deal with Conflict. Retrieved from https://www.civilsocietyhowto.org/10-tips-for-dealing-with-conflict/
This resource summarizes how to recognize and deal with conflict. The article discusses how being aware that a small amount of conflict is natural and necessary would be constructive and not destructive.
- Clarke, P. (n.d.). Teaching Controversial Issues in the Classroom: A four-step strategy for clear thinking on controversial issues. Retrieved from https://www.teachers.ab.ca/News%20Room/ata%20magazine/Volume%2087/Number%204/Articles/Pages/Teaching%20Controversial%20Issues%20in%20the%20Classroom.aspx
This resource discusses approaches that educators can implement in teaching controversial issues. This process will help to develop critical reflection and open-mindedness in students.
- Royal Roads University. (n.d.). Engaging in Difficult Conversations. Retrieved from http://media.royalroads.ca/owl/media/teamswork/docs/Engaging-in-difficult-conversations.pdf
This two-page resources will have you prepare for having difficult conversations and give you triggers to look out for while the conversation is happening.
- United States Institute of Peace. (n.d.). Conflict Styles Assessment. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/public-education/students/conflict-styles-assessment
This thirty-question assessment will give you a breakdown of your personal conflict style. This information will show you your natural tendencies in regard to conflict, and some potential weaknesses that may cause.
Optional /Extra Resources
- Bapple, K. (2014, October 24). How to Handle Conflict and Controversy in Online Communities [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://blog.higherlogic.com/2014/10/23/how-to-handle-conflict-and-controversy-in-online-communities
This blog post introduces skills that can be used to manage conflict in online situations, as opposed to running or banning it. These skills may allow for more open and student lead online communities.
- Royal Roads University. (n.d.) How Do We Collaborate? Retrieved from http://teamswork.royalroads.ca/resources/how-do-we-collaborate
This resource is designed to help teams collaborate successfully. It includes steps to work through negotiations, obstacles, and gives an example of Team process tool.
- United States Institute of Peace. (n.d.). Peacebuilding Toolkit for Educators – A Resource for Middle School and High School Classrooms. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/public-education/educators/peacebuilding-toolkit-educators
This resource includes free downloadable tools kits for peacekeeping in Middle school and high school. It can be used to help teachers grow their own peacebuilding skills and introduce the topic to the students.
-
- O’Neill, T., Hoffart, G., McLarnon, M., Woodley, H., Eggermont, M., Rosehart, W., & Brennan, R. (2017). Constructive controversy and reflexivity training promotes effective conflict profiles and team functioning in student learning teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2).
This research article discusses constructive controversy and finds that when paired with proper conflict training can enhance team success.
Week 1: Managing controversy and conflict
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Learners will be able to:
-
- A. Identify their own conflict style
- B. Understand strategies to address conflict and controversy
- C. Recognize conflict and controversy
LEARNING ACTIVITIES
- Learning Activity 1.1: Conflict Styles
-
-
-
- Determine your conflict style by taking the USIP online quiz
- Post your conflict style on the discussion board and how you feel it affects you in day to day interactions
- How might this affect your interactions in an online environment
- https://padlet.com/jeff_clemens/yoxhvxb6imir
-
-
- Learning Activity 1.2: Discussion Board Topic – Understanding controversy
-
-
-
- What is something in your daily life that could potentially cause controversy (Team names, city names, locations)
- How do you feel about this controversy
- What kind of bias do you think you might bring when looking at this controversy
- Discuss these issues with other classmates in a respectful and exploratory manner
- https://padlet.com/jeff_clemens/py4lstpjh8xh
-
-
- Learning Activity 1.3: Evidence of Learning Survey
-
-
- A concluding survey to demonstrate learning and gather feedback
- https://forms.gle/vueqzRXKEtaErMf86
-
TECHNOLOGY
The module will be offered on Articulate 360 Rise. This platform is accessible on all devices and is very easy and intuitive to navigate. There are also many members of our team who have previously used the Articulate platform either in their day to day work or through the Royal Roads MALAT program. We also found that the linear structure really helps make the platform user-friendly and intuitive. As the student scrolls down they are provided a chronological order of what to accomplish including readings, activities, watching videos, assignments, and surveys. Articulate provides a percentage completed in the top left corner which helps learners understand how far along they are in the course. The layout is clean and doesn’t distract from the learning objectives. It is accessible and holds the same functionality on PC, tablet, or cellphones. Finally, the platform was available to use and has intuitive features for facilitators to update and make edits to the course materials at a moment’s notice with minimal or no training required.
The context is a week-long course, students don’t need a new interface that they have to learn, it should be as simple to use as possible allowing students to maximize their time focusing on the learning objectives rather than trying to navigate new technology. If the course had been much longer then perhaps we may have chosen a different platform, however for the context of a one-week simple course with few objective and few activities we felt the Articulate had the most to offer in the most intuitive design.
We chose Padlet for the purpose of allowing students to share video, audio, imagery and/or written discussions and responses. Social presence is important and allowing students to see each other’s faces in an asynchronous environment can help make the collaboration more ‘real.’ The idea behind this was also to give the initial post the option of also posting a text post knowing that due to the nature of the topic some students may not feel comfortable recording that.
We will also be using Mattermost as a way to further connect with learners throughout this module and as a way to connect with them throughout and encourage engagement. This platform was chosen because all participants have previously gone through training with this tool as part of their participation in LRNT528. This likely means that through their previous learning they should be prepared for using this tool during this activity. In order to help differentiate this module from the main part of the class we will create a channel within Mattermost specifically for work around this module. We will create a Conflict and Controversy channel but use the main Town Hall channel for intial communication.
WORKFLOW
Day 1 – Introduction Video – This will give an introduction to the module for the learners. It will be accompanied with the text of the video included (captioned) (Team video)
Day 2/3 – Conflict styles – USIP Quiz and discussion (Joyce)
Day 4/5 – Discussion topic- Understanding controversy (Jeff and Alastair)
Day 6 – Conclusion Survey (Team)
Day 6 – Closing message to participants (Team conclusion/Jeff recording)
One member of the team will focus on communication in Mattermost. (Amanda)
| Week 1 – Managing Conflict and Controversy Sunday September 22 to Saturday September 28, 2019 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Deadline | Course Activities | Learning Outcomes |
| Ongoing | Contribution to the learning community discussion | |
| Sept. 22 – Sept. 28 | Complete Readings | |
| Tues. Sept. 24 | Activity 1 – Complete Conflict Style Quiz and participate in discussion | A |
| Fri. Sept. 27 | Activity 2 – Participate in Discussion on Controversy | B, C |
| Sat. Sept. 28 | Submit Evaluation Survey by 5 pm MST | |
COMMUNICATION
Will communicate with our cohort through Mattermost through the main “town hall” course channel. We will also post our module and check-in/summary videos.
PRESENCE
- Teaching
-
- Introduction videos will help create a guiding path which will introduce the teaching presence
-
- The content chosen was done so to create questions to encourage the learners to discuss
-
- The activities are self directed but the directions are clear to encourage students along a specific path with the freedom to roam
-
- Mattermost will be used to help encourage or answer any question so learners know they are supported
- Social
-
- The activities (with the exception of the final survey) are all collaborative. This will allow the learners to create and add to a social presence within the course
-
- The activities chosen are done in a way to increase the social presence and to help build a Community of Inquiry around the topics covered in this module.
-
- Technology allows for more social interaction allowing for video and images to be used that creates a more ‘real’ asynchronous discussion/environment.
- Cognitive
-
- The learners will be looking at and assessing their own feelings and bias’ through the first activity. The cognitive presence will be present here in that the learners will demonstrate a self-awareness through this exploration
-
- The second activity is a self-assessment of each learner’ conflict styles. This will allow another form of cognitive self-assessment
-
- The final assessment with the survey will give learners an opportunity to reflect on what they learned and give the facilitators an opportunity to assess cognition from the learners based on their answers.
- The final video will address the learning and responses from the participants and provide a reflection on the week.
September 14, 2019 at 8:55 am
Thanks for your draft. You are on a good path here.
My major suggestion would be to really narrow the focus of the week as there is a lot happening, and to look closely at the alignment of your activities with your stated LO. Do you have an activity that will meet your first LO to “recognize early stages of conflict and controversy in an online course”. I think that is an excellent LO for this module, but not sure I am seeing a path to that LO in the activities and/or readings.
The evidence of learning survey is a very good ending activity, but I would suggest reducing the activities and really focus on meeting one or two LO well by closely aligning them with your activities and readings.
Additionally, in your final facilitation plan I would suggest expanding on your decision as to why you wish to use Articulate Rise 360? What affordances of this technology make it well suited to use in this context, and how will you support learners who are new to this tool?