Reading Reiser (2001) and Weller (2018) gives a great view into how technology has changed within the field of education and how in many ways nothing has changed but new terms have been created to discuss old ideas.
The history contained, and the technology used in the article by Reiser (2001) gives a snapshot of when he was writing. The discussion about the new technologies of the time like the internet and CD-ROM create an interesting discussion about the relevance of what is written. It would be easy to simply write off large portions of this writing because it revolves around old and potentially archaic technology (most computers don’t even have a disk drive anymore). That thinking would miss the parts of the discussion that are still relevant to today’s learning like the uncertainty that exists when using media in the classroom. That media may have changed formats and now lives in a “cloud” but there is still potential for that same apprehension and uncertainty when using new technology.
A lesson that I take from both Reiser (2001) and Weller (2018) is to look at what has been done and not to quickly move on to the newer and flashier solution. There will always be something new to use that may be better, but it may not always be the correct solution. Looking at Reiser (2001) talk about the uncertainty and Weller discuss the different technologies really gives a perspective that even though the technology changes, we’re still solving many of the same problems. I found this to be very evident in the LMS section of the Weller (2018) article where he discusses how something used for innovation became something that prevented it.
I found that the conclusion in the Weller (2018) article that discussed the failure to address the social impact is something that goes at odds with my day-to-day work. As a coordinator in the school I regularly have discussion with instructors about the social impact of pushing learners onto platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn and Github. The responsibilities of higher education and our responsibilities as educators is something that is regularly top of mind among our team as many of us are hyper aware of what occurs in the back end of these websites. That said we often conclude that while we may be pushing learners out of their comfort zone, it may be necessary for future work.
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development,49(1), 53-64. doi:10.1007/bf02504506
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part II: A history of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development,49(2), 57-67. doi:10.1007/bf02504928
Weller, M. (2018). Twenty years of EdTech. EDUCAUSE Review, 53(4).
September 13, 2018 at 9:24 am
Thank you for these comments, Jeff, and for highlighting the relevance of Reiser’s article even if it was written 17 years ago now.
The field has generally taken an optimistic perspective on technology. This is the sort of thing that Weller critiques when he raises the issue of social impacts. Beyond encouraging students to explore new platforms, and potentially informing them about their drawbacks, I wonder how much we are actually doing to develop better alternatives. For example, if we disagree with the notion that social media platforms should collect a never-ending array of student data, are we developing platforms that eschew data collection? Are we actually resisting the current system of never-ending data collection, and developing better alternatives, or are we informing people of the status quo and continue using these systems?
In other words, are we developing better systems, better technologies, better pedagogies for better futures, or are we using what’s available without fully accounting for the potential social ills of current systems?
September 13, 2018 at 8:35 pm
It’s interesting that you say that about just sticking with the status quo. I hadn’t actually thought about that so I suppose I am guilty of doing just that. An attitude of these are the tools available to us, so we’ll make them work.
I think you’re mostly right when you say we’re simply using what is available without looking for something better. I know one way we’ve looked at it is to actually move back away from the newer technology and go straight to the source code (literally with HTML, CSS and Javascript) when creating online content to allow more freedom but we’re still constrained within the hosting of a provider. I suppose we’re currently using that now with WordPress in these comments but I’m not sure there is currently a better way and this may be the better way being free from the restrictive LMS system (as Weller describes it).
September 13, 2018 at 10:19 pm
Hi Jeff, I really enjoyed reading your post. I had just made a comment about how most computers do not even have CD drives anymore earlier today. I often discuss with my students what the save icon (a floppy disc) and for them they have never known it to be anything but a save icon. However, the evolution of data management and technology is something I still think is relevant as it sheds light on how we ended up where we did.
The lesson to not always go with the new and shinny option I think is one that many people are starting to come back to. I see it in education, less tablets, as well as in the community in general right now , people downsizing or living simpler lives. With how quickly technology grew in the last two decades, it is interesting to see the current theme of people coming up for a breath of fresh air and reevaluating.
Thanks,
Amanda
September 14, 2018 at 10:39 pm
Hi Jeff,
The last part of your post resonated with me because it brought back memories of my undergraduate studies in Venezuela, 2008, where one of my courses required me to join Twitter to complete activities. I remember being so reluctant to join, no options were given, it was either pass or fail. Though the lecturer at that time may have had good intentions it resulted in some students being withdrawn (lack of interest) from the class. I think as Educators we need to engage with our students more, have discussions get to know what their thoughts are, listen more. As George stated, “how much we are actually doing to develop better alternatives? “. Are we too concerned about what new technologies or social platforms are going to introduce? Are we finding solutions for our students who encounter problems in these spaces? We need to find solutions and better strategies in tackling these issues as we move forward.
Cheers
Phyz
September 16, 2018 at 9:49 pm
Great post and very thought provoking! I was wondering what keeping up with the new and trendy technologies really does in terms of those who may be used to one system versus another. The technology is getting updated but also the individuals who work with these tools also need to ensure proper training as well. I think this may have a larger social impact than we are even aware of.
Food for thought!