One theoretical framework I am interested in including in my applied research project is motivational theory. Key theoretical concepts of motivational theory examine the individual’s beliefs and contextual factors that influence their motivation or impetus to learn (Park, 2018). Researchers have studied motivation from various perspectives, and I am interested in motivational theory because of the many ways that researchers interpret motivational theory within their research context. The Keller’s Arcs model of motivational theory includes the four categories: attention, relevance, confidence, and satisfaction. The first category states that the learner’s attention is required before any learning can take place. Another common motivational theory called self-determination theory explores the two orientations of motivation: intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (Park, 2018).
One topic I am interested in is how motivational theory relates to engagement theory. Engagement theory postulates that students that are engaged in learning have more success in learning (Kearsley et al, 1998). I view engagement theory and motivational theory as closely related, and the question I have is how to apply one or the other within a research context. Engagement is a key factor in both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and since most learning activities are not intrinsically interesting to students (Park, 2018), I view engagement as a strong component of learning. Engagement is also incredibly similar to attention, a pillar of the Keller’s Arcs model.
References
Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20-23
Park, S. (2018). Motivation Theories and Instructional Design. In West, R (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology: Historical roots and current trends. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations&nav_pos=0&nav_pos=0

