External Scan

image showing the four key elements of change: plan, adapt, support, and change.

Image template source: @arfamojila on Canva

Reading about change management and the various models that could be used was mind-opening (Al-Haddad & Kotnour, 2015). Discussing change and change management with colleagues allowed me to narrow down four important key points for change. These four key points are planning, adapting, supporting, and educating. 

Recently, the daycare has gone through a significant change in that it expanded and doubled the amount of children in the centre. Both colleagues I discussed with mentioned the planning it took the leader to make this change go as smoothly as possible (C. Bentivegna, personal communication, February 9, 2024). Because the expansion was happening while the rest of the daycare was open, the director ensured the children already enrolled could still come as we could not shut down. Thus, ensuring the daycare remained open took much organization and planning. Regarding technological change, each class has recently been supplied with laptops. 

The provided laptops were to help educators plan activities, create a weekly schedule, and move towards creating the children’s portfolios using Microsoft Publisher instead of printing, glueing, and handwriting comments on paper. The provision of laptops also took much planning as the director needed to discuss the idea with the board of directors to get approval, and only then could the laptops and necessary software be provided. Of course, this was with some challenges, which brings up the idea that a leader must be adaptable. 

My colleagues and I discussed the need to make adaptations during these changes. While the director was organized and had planned for the change, there were some setbacks. Some setbacks involved were the delayed delivery of the materials, causing the two new daycare rooms to not open on time while the children were still coming to the daycare. Thus, the educators and director needed to adapt by briefly having the children enter a different class (C. Bentivegna, personal communication, February 9, 2024). Regarding the laptop, the educators needed to adapt to that change as they were not used to using the software implemented to create the children’s portfolios (A.B. Reis, personal communication, February 14, 2024). These two changes were extensive and required the director to plan and adapt accordingly. 

Both changes mentioned are on a large scale as they involve much planning, adapting, and vision (Al-Haddad & Kotnour, 2015). The board of directors was involved in both the expansion and the decision to provide the laptops, and the educators were asked for their input. While no formal change management method was mentioned, based on discussions and the strategies discussed by Al-Haddaded and Kotnour (2015), the organization seemed most similar to the Jick and Kanter method. This method has ten phases, and through the conversations I had with my colleagues, a few of them were brought up. The director analyzed the need for change, created a vision, developed a plan, communicated these ideas to the educators, and reinforced the change by providing necessary support. 

The implementation of laptops was where employees expressed their apprehension the most. As one of my colleagues mentioned, they were worried about using laptops as they are not the most tech-savvy (A.B. Reis, personal communication, February 14, 2024). On the other hand, my other colleague was relieved as it helped to make planning, finding activities and making portfolios more efficient (C. Bentivegna, personal communication, February 9, 2024). These differing opinions on this change are reminiscent of Weiner’s (2009) idea about change valence, as one colleague saw the value in the laptops right away compared to the other who was unsure about using them. Thus, the question was, what did the educators need to be at ease with using this new software? How can the director help with those needs? The director saw this apprehension and offered support by providing them with informational sessions on using the software. 

In order to support these educators, the strategy used was informational, where the educators were taught how to use the software through step-by-step workshops (Biech, 2007). If this session was not enough, she provided the educators with one-on-one sessions, which one colleague said was valuable to help increase their understanding of using the software (A.B. Reis, personal communication, February 14, 2024). The director still provides these informational sessions as new employees are onboarded throughout the year. These sessions are still valuable to employees, new and old, as the workshops are constantly evolving based on differing needs. Ultimately, the educators feel supported and more comfortable using the software. 

To conclude, these four key elements are what my colleagues felt were essential to making successful changes in the daycare. What was interesting about coming up with these elements was the experience they each had at the daycare, one colleague having over thirty years and another having six. While the amount of experience here differs, they both discussed the need for a leader to plan, adapt, support and educate. Thus, it shows that these four elements are valuable for a leader during a change. 


References 

Al-Haddad, S., & Kotnour, T. (2015). Integrating the organizational change literature: A model 

for successful change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(2), 234–262. 

https://doi.org/10.1108/jocm-11-2013-0215

Biech, E. (2007). Chapter 3: Models of Change. In Thriving Through Change: A Leader’s 

Practical Guide to Change Mastery (pp. 21–33). essay, ASTD Press. 

Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-67

A Reflection on Leadership

I have never been one to reflect on leadership; I have been in the same job with the same manager for approximately eight years and have yet to think about the different aspects a leader can bring to a team, nor have I thought about what kind of leader I could be. These last few exercises allowed me to reflect on what attributes, characteristics and values I would look for in someone in a leadership position. After completing the first activity, where I ranked different leadership attributes from 1-20 and then discussed them with my cohorts, I found my opinions on specific characteristics shifting in importance. 

After reading Workman and Clevland-Innes’ (2012) article on leadership versus management, a phrase that stood out to me in this reading was that “management affects outcomes for efforts, while leadership affects outcomes for people” (p. 319). I looked at this as managers trying to get favourable results from the workers, whereas a leader would try to see how they can help the team members reach their goals. Once I reflected on that and discussed it with my cohorts, my views on leadership characteristics somewhat changed, but not too drastically. For instance, one of my values when looking at leaders was that they were to be dependable, fair-minded, and cooperative, and while I still think that is true, they are no longer my top priority for leaders. I believe that what I would look for in a leader now would be that they are caring, communicative, and competent. Castelli (2016) discussed reflective leadership practices and the value of a leader being open to dialogue and feedback, which are attributes I would look for in a leader.  These attributes are essential when working in an early childhood setting where we must discuss the children’s abilities, interests and needs. As for leadership characteristics in a digital learning environment, I think leaders must be adaptable, as technology constantly changes.

 Khan (2017) discussed the concept of adaptive leadership in a higher education context. In the case of digital leadership, someone who is adaptable is vital as well. Adaptive leaders are flexible, recognize change, and find solutions that best fit their current challenges. As Shenigner (2022) pointed out in their definition of digital leadership, there is a lot of change, and schools constantly shift how technology is used to help students as new software and tools become available. Furthermore, in their seven pillars of digital leadership, Shenigner (2022) had communication in their first spot. In this context, communication would be a means to discuss with stakeholders in various ways, not just one way. For example, they could communicate through email and social media. Communication, whether in person or digitally, is essential for a leader. If they cannot communicate clearly, then issues could arise due to miscommunication.

Moreover, an adaptive leader could communicate differently depending on what others prefer (Khan, 2017). Another pillar that can connect to adaptive leadership would be to motivate students to be engaged (Shenigner, 2022). Both the pillar mentioned above and adaptive leaders find ways to encourage students to move beyond their capabilities and provide means to develop essential skills. Thus, the attributes I discussed, in the beginning, can also fit within digital and adaptive leadership, as I value a leader who can communicate and is caring and, after reading some articles, adaptable. 


References 

Castelli, P. A. (2016). Reflective Leadership Review: A framework for improving organisational performance. Journal of Management Development, 35(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmd-08-2015-0112

Khan, N. (2017). Adaptive or transactional leadership in current Higher Education: A brief comparison. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i3.3294

Sheninger, E. (2022, October 29). 7 pillars of Digital leadership. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. https://www.hmhco.com/blog/pillars-of-digital-leadership-in-education

Workman, T., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2012). Leadership, personal transformation, and management. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 313. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1383