Weller’s (2020) references to contractual obligations with vendors, file access limitation and a “good enough” (p. 64) Learning Management System (LMS) are some of the implications I captured from the author’s LMS chapter that still have relevance, not just for universities but also for organizations.  These implications are the reasons why, as a HR professional, I did not look for another LMS after my experience with implementing one in the mid-2000. Consequently, when I had to deliver compliance training during the pandemic, I went straight to Zoom to replicate a live session and I did not have a second thought for LMS.  Interestingly, one of the panel members from the podcast on the resistance & care for the LMS, shared her experience of overlooking LMS and using Zoom instead for similar reasons (Pasquini, 2021).  I could appreciate Weller’s (2020) point of using new technologies with “old ways” (p. 64) before the features of the new ones are being understood.  One of the panel members, an ed tech support, testified during the podcast of being asked the “most depressive question” (Pasquini,35.30) of “How do we do that in Moodle?” (Pasquini,35.34) when the user is trying to replicate the live teaching in LMS.  I wonder what function the LMS will still have moving forward, especially considering the pandemic, and what other solutions are being contemplated for the future of ed tech.

References:

Pasquini, L. (Host). (2021, January 7). Between the chapters: The LMS (No. 9) [Audio podcast episode]. In 25 Years of Ed Tech: The Serialized Audio Version. https://25years.opened.ca/2021/01/07/between-the-chapters-the-lms/

Weller, M. (2020). 25 years of ed tech. Athabasca University Press.